Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) : a review of mechanisms, modeling outcomes, and issues for debate

W.S.J. Malskat, A.A. Poluektova, C.W.M. Geld, van der, H.A.M. Neumann, R.A. Weiss, C.M.A. Bruijninckx, M.J.C. Gemert, van

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    66 Citations (Scopus)
    136 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) is a commonly used and very effective minimally invasive therapy to manage leg varicosities. Yet, and despite a clinical history of 16 years, no international consensus on a best treatment protocol has been reached so far. Evidence presented in this paper supports the opinion that insufficient knowledge of the underlying physics amongst frequent users could explain this shortcoming. In this review, we will examine the possible modes of action of EVLA, hoping that better understanding of EVLA-related physics stimulates critical appraisal of claims made concerning the efficacy of EVLA devices, and may advance identifying a best possible treatment protocol. Finally, physical arguments are presented to debate on long-standing, but often unfounded, clinical opinions and habits. This includes issues such as (1) the importance of laser power versus the lack of clinical relevance of laser energy (Joule) as used in Joule per centimeter vein length, i.e., in linear endovenous energy density (LEED), and Joule per square centimeter vein wall area, (2) the predicted effectiveness of a higher power and faster pullback velocity, (3) the irrelevance of whether laser light is absorbed by hemoglobin or water, and (4) the effectiveness of reducing the vein diameter during EVLA therapy.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)393-403
    Number of pages11
    JournalLasers in Medical Science
    Volume29
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) : a review of mechanisms, modeling outcomes, and issues for debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this