Efficient visit frequencies for polling tables: minimization of waiting cost

O.J. Boxma, H. Levy, J.A. Weststrate

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    46 Citations (Scopus)
    2 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Polling systems have been used as a central model for the modeling and analysis of many communication systems. Examples include the Token Ring network and a communications switch. The common property of these systems is the need to efficiently share a single resource (server) amongN entities (stations). In spite of the massive research effort in this area, very little work has been devoted to the issue of how toefficiently operate these systems. In the present paper we deal with this problem, namely with how to efficiently allocate the server's attention among theN stations. We consider a framework in which a predetermined fixed visit order (polling table) is used to establish the order by which the server visits the stations, and we address the problem of how to construct an efficient (optimal) polling table. In selecting a polling table the objective is to minimize the mean waiting cost of the system, a weighted sum of the mean delays with arbitrary cost parameters. Since the optimization problem involved is very hard, we use an approximate approach. Using two independent analyses, based on a lower bound and on mean delay approximations, we derive very simple rules for the determination of efficient polling tables. The two rules are very similar and even coincide in most cases. Extensive numerical examination shows that the rules perform well and that in most cases the system operates very close to its optimal operation point.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)133-162
    Number of pages30
    JournalQueueing Systems: Theory and Applications
    Volume9
    Issue number1-2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1991

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Efficient visit frequencies for polling tables: minimization of waiting cost'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this