Does controlling work?: Mediated power and contractual specificity as means to align perceptions in projects

H.J.C. van der Krift; A.J. van Weele; J.M.P. Gevers

Does controlling work? Mediated power and contractual specificity as means to align perceptions in projects

H.J.C. van der Krift, A.J. van Weele, J.M.P. Gevers

Research output: Contribution to conference › Other › Academic

Abstract

This study addresses perceptual distance between principal and agent in projects and how the principal attempts to prevent or mitigate this perceptual distance by means of control. Specifically, we investigate two controlling mechanisms: power-based control (i.e. mediated power) and contract-based control (contractual specificity) and we study how these two mechanisms influence the perceptual distance that is observed on several key relationship issues through their effect on social identification and information asymmetry. We investigate these phenomena in four rail-infrastructure projects. Based upon a cross-case comparison we can conclude that both control measures do not decrease perceptual distance; on the contrary, mediated power rather increases perceptual distance. Other findings are that acknowledgement of power that is held at both sides and contractual quality are features of the projects in which less perceptual distance is found.

Original language	English
Publication status	Unpublished - 26 Mar 2018
Event	27th IPSERA Conference 2018 - Athens, Greece Duration: 25 Mar 2018 → 28 Mar 2018 http://www.ipsera.com/Conference2018

Conference

Conference	27th IPSERA Conference 2018
Country	Greece
City	Athens
Period	25/03/18 → 28/03/18
Internet address	http://www.ipsera.com/Conference2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Does controlling work? Mediated power and contractual specificity as means to align perceptions in projects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@conference{4e8602066c6940f194818dd95f177085,

title = "Does controlling work?: Mediated power and contractual specificity as means to align perceptions in projects",

abstract = "This study addresses perceptual distance between principal and agent in projects and how the principal attempts to prevent or mitigate this perceptual distance by means of control. Specifically, we investigate two controlling mechanisms: power-based control (i.e. mediated power) and contract-based control (contractual specificity) and we study how these two mechanisms influence the perceptual distance that is observed on several key relationship issues through their effect on social identification and information asymmetry. We investigate these phenomena in four rail-infrastructure projects. Based upon a cross-case comparison we can conclude that both control measures do not decrease perceptual distance; on the contrary, mediated power rather increases perceptual distance. Other findings are that acknowledgement of power that is held at both sides and contractual quality are features of the projects in which less perceptual distance is found.",

author = "{van der Krift}, H.J.C. and {van Weele}, A.J. and J.M.P. Gevers",

year = "2018",

month = mar,

day = "26",

language = "English",

note = "27th IPSERA Conference 2018 ; Conference date: 25-03-2018 Through 28-03-2018",

url = "http://www.ipsera.com/Conference2018",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Does controlling work?

T2 - 27th IPSERA Conference 2018

AU - van der Krift, H.J.C.

AU - van Weele, A.J.

AU - Gevers, J.M.P.

PY - 2018/3/26

Y1 - 2018/3/26

N2 - This study addresses perceptual distance between principal and agent in projects and how the principal attempts to prevent or mitigate this perceptual distance by means of control. Specifically, we investigate two controlling mechanisms: power-based control (i.e. mediated power) and contract-based control (contractual specificity) and we study how these two mechanisms influence the perceptual distance that is observed on several key relationship issues through their effect on social identification and information asymmetry. We investigate these phenomena in four rail-infrastructure projects. Based upon a cross-case comparison we can conclude that both control measures do not decrease perceptual distance; on the contrary, mediated power rather increases perceptual distance. Other findings are that acknowledgement of power that is held at both sides and contractual quality are features of the projects in which less perceptual distance is found.

AB - This study addresses perceptual distance between principal and agent in projects and how the principal attempts to prevent or mitigate this perceptual distance by means of control. Specifically, we investigate two controlling mechanisms: power-based control (i.e. mediated power) and contract-based control (contractual specificity) and we study how these two mechanisms influence the perceptual distance that is observed on several key relationship issues through their effect on social identification and information asymmetry. We investigate these phenomena in four rail-infrastructure projects. Based upon a cross-case comparison we can conclude that both control measures do not decrease perceptual distance; on the contrary, mediated power rather increases perceptual distance. Other findings are that acknowledgement of power that is held at both sides and contractual quality are features of the projects in which less perceptual distance is found.

M3 - Other

Y2 - 25 March 2018 through 28 March 2018

ER -