Do we have enough data? Robust reliability via uncertainty quantification

Roberto Rocchetta, Matteo Broggi, Edoardo Patelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A generalised probabilistic framework is proposed for reliability assessment and uncertainty quantification under a lack of data. The developed computational tool allows the effect of epistemic uncertainty to be quantified and has been applied to assess the reliability of an electronic circuit and a power transmission network. The strength and weakness of the proposed approach are illustrated by comparison to traditional probabilistic approaches. In the presence of both aleatory and epistemic uncertainty, classic probabilistic approaches may lead to misleading conclusions and a false sense of confidence which may not fully represent the quality of the available information. In contrast, generalised probabilistic approaches are versatile and powerful when linked to a computational tool that permits their applicability to realistic engineering problems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)710-721
Number of pages12
JournalApplied Mathematical Modelling
Volume54
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Computational tool
  • Dempster–Shafer
  • Information quality
  • Probability boxes
  • Reliability
  • Uncertainty quantification

Cite this

@article{ae65bb1274c243c69bb7602f415dc8d6,
title = "Do we have enough data? Robust reliability via uncertainty quantification",
abstract = "A generalised probabilistic framework is proposed for reliability assessment and uncertainty quantification under a lack of data. The developed computational tool allows the effect of epistemic uncertainty to be quantified and has been applied to assess the reliability of an electronic circuit and a power transmission network. The strength and weakness of the proposed approach are illustrated by comparison to traditional probabilistic approaches. In the presence of both aleatory and epistemic uncertainty, classic probabilistic approaches may lead to misleading conclusions and a false sense of confidence which may not fully represent the quality of the available information. In contrast, generalised probabilistic approaches are versatile and powerful when linked to a computational tool that permits their applicability to realistic engineering problems.",
keywords = "Computational tool, Dempster–Shafer, Information quality, Probability boxes, Reliability, Uncertainty quantification",
author = "Roberto Rocchetta and Matteo Broggi and Edoardo Patelli",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.apm.2017.10.020",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "710--721",
journal = "Applied Mathematical Modelling",
issn = "0307-904X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Do we have enough data? Robust reliability via uncertainty quantification. / Rocchetta, Roberto; Broggi, Matteo; Patelli, Edoardo.

In: Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 54, 01.02.2018, p. 710-721.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do we have enough data? Robust reliability via uncertainty quantification

AU - Rocchetta, Roberto

AU - Broggi, Matteo

AU - Patelli, Edoardo

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - A generalised probabilistic framework is proposed for reliability assessment and uncertainty quantification under a lack of data. The developed computational tool allows the effect of epistemic uncertainty to be quantified and has been applied to assess the reliability of an electronic circuit and a power transmission network. The strength and weakness of the proposed approach are illustrated by comparison to traditional probabilistic approaches. In the presence of both aleatory and epistemic uncertainty, classic probabilistic approaches may lead to misleading conclusions and a false sense of confidence which may not fully represent the quality of the available information. In contrast, generalised probabilistic approaches are versatile and powerful when linked to a computational tool that permits their applicability to realistic engineering problems.

AB - A generalised probabilistic framework is proposed for reliability assessment and uncertainty quantification under a lack of data. The developed computational tool allows the effect of epistemic uncertainty to be quantified and has been applied to assess the reliability of an electronic circuit and a power transmission network. The strength and weakness of the proposed approach are illustrated by comparison to traditional probabilistic approaches. In the presence of both aleatory and epistemic uncertainty, classic probabilistic approaches may lead to misleading conclusions and a false sense of confidence which may not fully represent the quality of the available information. In contrast, generalised probabilistic approaches are versatile and powerful when linked to a computational tool that permits their applicability to realistic engineering problems.

KW - Computational tool

KW - Dempster–Shafer

KW - Information quality

KW - Probability boxes

KW - Reliability

KW - Uncertainty quantification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037809995&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3014888/

U2 - 10.1016/j.apm.2017.10.020

DO - 10.1016/j.apm.2017.10.020

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 710

EP - 721

JO - Applied Mathematical Modelling

JF - Applied Mathematical Modelling

SN - 0307-904X

ER -