Abstract
It is commonly thought that on Kant’s view of action, ‘everyone always acts on maxims.’ Call this the ‘descriptive reading.’ This reading faces two important problems: first, the idea that people always act on maxims offends against common sense: it clashes with our ordinary ideas about human agency. Second, there are various passages in which Kant says that it is ‘rare’ and ‘admirable’ to firmly adhere to a set of basic principles that we adopt for ourselves. This article offers an alternative: the ‘normative reading.’ On this reading, it is a normative ideal to adopt and act on maxims: it is one of the things Kant thinks we would do if our reason were fully in control of our decision-making.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 233-255 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Kantian Review |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2017 |
Keywords
- Kant
- Maxims
- Common sense
- Action
- Reason
- normativity
- character
- agency
- maxims
- action
- basic principles
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Do we always act on maxims?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver