Discussion of a proof, given by selleri and tarozzi, of the nonlocality of quantum mechanics

W. M. De Muynck; J.T.P.M. van Stekelenborg

doi:10.1016/0375-9601(86)90373-7

Discussion of a proof, given by selleri and tarozzi, of the nonlocality of quantum mechanics

W. M. De Muynck
, J.T.P.M. van Stekelenborg

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three different interpretations of quantum mechanics are investigated in order to see whether a claim by Selleri and Tarozzi, to the effect that quantum mechanics is observably nonlocal, can be substantiated. It is demonstrated that none of these interpretations does support the claim.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	420-422
Number of pages	3
Journal	Physics Letters A
Volume	116
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(86)90373-7
Publication status	Published - 14 Jul 1986

Access to Document

10.1016/0375-9601(86)90373-7

Cite this

@article{fab42438c1984895b0efb4ed4d59a08b,

title = "Discussion of a proof, given by selleri and tarozzi, of the nonlocality of quantum mechanics",

abstract = "Three different interpretations of quantum mechanics are investigated in order to see whether a claim by Selleri and Tarozzi, to the effect that quantum mechanics is observably nonlocal, can be substantiated. It is demonstrated that none of these interpretations does support the claim.",

author = "\{De Muynck\}, \{W. M.\} and \{van Stekelenborg\}, J.T.P.M.",

year = "1986",

month = jul,

day = "14",

doi = "10.1016/0375-9601(86)90373-7",

language = "English",

volume = "116",

pages = "420--422",

journal = "Physics Letters A",

issn = "0375-9601",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discussion of a proof, given by selleri and tarozzi, of the nonlocality of quantum mechanics

AU - De Muynck, W. M.

AU - van Stekelenborg, J.T.P.M.

PY - 1986/7/14

Y1 - 1986/7/14

N2 - Three different interpretations of quantum mechanics are investigated in order to see whether a claim by Selleri and Tarozzi, to the effect that quantum mechanics is observably nonlocal, can be substantiated. It is demonstrated that none of these interpretations does support the claim.

AB - Three different interpretations of quantum mechanics are investigated in order to see whether a claim by Selleri and Tarozzi, to the effect that quantum mechanics is observably nonlocal, can be substantiated. It is demonstrated that none of these interpretations does support the claim.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/46149131463

U2 - 10.1016/0375-9601(86)90373-7

DO - 10.1016/0375-9601(86)90373-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:46149131463

SN - 0375-9601

VL - 116

SP - 420

EP - 422

JO - Physics Letters A

JF - Physics Letters A

IS - 9

ER -

Discussion of a proof, given by selleri and tarozzi, of the nonlocality of quantum mechanics

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this