Abstract
According to Marr, explanations of perceptual behavior should address multiple levels of analysis. Rahnev & Denison (R&D) are perhaps overly dismissive of optimality considerations at the computational level. Also, an exclusive reliance on standard observer models may cause neglect of many other plausible hypotheses at the algorithmic level. Therefore, as far as explanation goes, standard observer modeling is no panacea.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e249 |
| Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Volume | 41 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Decision Making
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Descending Marr's levels: Standard observers are no panacea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver