Deceptive visualizations and user bias: a case for personalization and ambiguity in PI visualizations

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In Personal Informatics (PI) systems, users can obtain information
about themselves and the way they live their lives.
Such data can be difficult to interpret: what constitutes a
high value for one person may be normal for another. And
what if the data does not match the user’s self-image? Our
study shows that participants’ interpretations of feedback
about their stress level were biased by their expectations
of what the graph ‘should’ show. Nevertheless, participants
were susceptible to value interpretations of their data suggested
by the visualization. This latter finding may be problematic
if the standardized interpretation suggested by such
a system is not accurate for the individual user in question.
We therefore argue that value interpretations of PI
data should be personalized and future designs of PI data
visualizations should incorporate ambiguity and visualize
uncertainty.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationUbicomp 2016: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery, Inc
Pages588-593
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-4503-4462-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Event2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp 2016) - Heidelberg, Germany
Duration: 12 Sept 201616 Sept 2016
http://ubicomp.org/ubicomp2016/index.php

Conference

Conference2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp 2016)
Abbreviated titleUbiComp2016
Country/TerritoryGermany
CityHeidelberg
Period12/09/1616/09/16
Internet address

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Deceptive visualizations and user bias: a case for personalization and ambiguity in PI visualizations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this