Cubital tunnel syndrome : a comparison of an endoscopic technique with a minimal invasive open technique

M.A.J. Bolster, O.T. Zöphel, E.R. Heuvel, van den, M. Ruettermann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Both open and endoscopic methods for ulnar nerve decompression have been described. The purpose of this study is to compare the 6-month results of a minimal invasive open technique with an endoscopic technique. We treated 60 patients with unilateral ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, employing both techniques. Six months postoperative we found no differences in treatment effect on pain and disability scores between both groups, but both techniques resulted in an early postoperative relief of symptoms and good patient satisfaction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)621-625
JournalJornal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
Ulnar Neuropathies
Ulnar Nerve
Elbow
Decompression
Patient Satisfaction
Pain
Therapeutics

Cite this

@article{c853cf60e0ae4fe78317e502f077384b,
title = "Cubital tunnel syndrome : a comparison of an endoscopic technique with a minimal invasive open technique",
abstract = "Both open and endoscopic methods for ulnar nerve decompression have been described. The purpose of this study is to compare the 6-month results of a minimal invasive open technique with an endoscopic technique. We treated 60 patients with unilateral ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, employing both techniques. Six months postoperative we found no differences in treatment effect on pain and disability scores between both groups, but both techniques resulted in an early postoperative relief of symptoms and good patient satisfaction.",
author = "M.A.J. Bolster and O.T. Z{\"o}phel and {Heuvel, van den}, E.R. and M. Ruettermann",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/1753193413498547",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "621--625",
journal = "Jornal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)",
issn = "1753-1934",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Cubital tunnel syndrome : a comparison of an endoscopic technique with a minimal invasive open technique. / Bolster, M.A.J.; Zöphel, O.T.; Heuvel, van den, E.R.; Ruettermann, M.

In: Jornal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), Vol. 39, No. 6, 2014, p. 621-625.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cubital tunnel syndrome : a comparison of an endoscopic technique with a minimal invasive open technique

AU - Bolster, M.A.J.

AU - Zöphel, O.T.

AU - Heuvel, van den, E.R.

AU - Ruettermann, M.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Both open and endoscopic methods for ulnar nerve decompression have been described. The purpose of this study is to compare the 6-month results of a minimal invasive open technique with an endoscopic technique. We treated 60 patients with unilateral ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, employing both techniques. Six months postoperative we found no differences in treatment effect on pain and disability scores between both groups, but both techniques resulted in an early postoperative relief of symptoms and good patient satisfaction.

AB - Both open and endoscopic methods for ulnar nerve decompression have been described. The purpose of this study is to compare the 6-month results of a minimal invasive open technique with an endoscopic technique. We treated 60 patients with unilateral ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, employing both techniques. Six months postoperative we found no differences in treatment effect on pain and disability scores between both groups, but both techniques resulted in an early postoperative relief of symptoms and good patient satisfaction.

U2 - 10.1177/1753193413498547

DO - 10.1177/1753193413498547

M3 - Article

C2 - 23877730

VL - 39

SP - 621

EP - 625

JO - Jornal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)

JF - Jornal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)

SN - 1753-1934

IS - 6

ER -