TY - JOUR
T1 - CT image segmentation methods for bone used in medical additive manufacturing
AU - van Eijnatten, Maureen
AU - van Dijk, Roelof
AU - Dobbe, Johannes
AU - Streekstra, Geert
AU - Koivisto, Juha
AU - Wolff, Jan
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Aim of the study The accuracy of additive manufactured medical constructs is limited by errors introduced during image segmentation. The aim of this study was to review the existing literature on different image segmentation methods used in medical additive manufacturing. Methods Thirty-two publications that reported on the accuracy of bone segmentation based on computed tomography images were identified using PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The advantages and disadvantages of the different segmentation methods used in these studies were evaluated and reported accuracies were compared. Results The spread between the reported accuracies was large (0.04 mm – 1.9 mm). Global thresholding was the most commonly used segmentation method with accuracies under 0.6 mm. The disadvantage of this method is the extensive manual post-processing required. Advanced thresholding methods could improve the accuracy to under 0.38 mm. However, such methods are currently not included in commercial software packages. Statistical shape model methods resulted in accuracies from 0.25 mm to 1.9 mm but are only suitable for anatomical structures with moderate anatomical variations. Conclusions Thresholding remains the most widely used segmentation method in medical additive manufacturing. To improve the accuracy and reduce the costs of patient-specific additive manufactured constructs, more advanced segmentation methods are required.
AB - Aim of the study The accuracy of additive manufactured medical constructs is limited by errors introduced during image segmentation. The aim of this study was to review the existing literature on different image segmentation methods used in medical additive manufacturing. Methods Thirty-two publications that reported on the accuracy of bone segmentation based on computed tomography images were identified using PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The advantages and disadvantages of the different segmentation methods used in these studies were evaluated and reported accuracies were compared. Results The spread between the reported accuracies was large (0.04 mm – 1.9 mm). Global thresholding was the most commonly used segmentation method with accuracies under 0.6 mm. The disadvantage of this method is the extensive manual post-processing required. Advanced thresholding methods could improve the accuracy to under 0.38 mm. However, such methods are currently not included in commercial software packages. Statistical shape model methods resulted in accuracies from 0.25 mm to 1.9 mm but are only suitable for anatomical structures with moderate anatomical variations. Conclusions Thresholding remains the most widely used segmentation method in medical additive manufacturing. To improve the accuracy and reduce the costs of patient-specific additive manufactured constructs, more advanced segmentation methods are required.
KW - 3D printing
KW - Accuracy
KW - Additive manufacturing (AM)
KW - Computed tomography (CT)
KW - Image segmentation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032747280&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.10.008
DO - 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.10.008
M3 - Review article
SN - 1350-4533
VL - 51
SP - 6
EP - 16
JO - Medical Engineering & Physics
JF - Medical Engineering & Physics
ER -