Critical discussion : virtue epistemology and extended cognition: a reply to Kelp and Greco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Elsewhere, I have challenged virtue epistemology and argued that it doesn’t square with mundane cases of extended cognition. Kelp (forthcoming, this journal) and Greco (forthcoming) have responded to my charges, the former by questioning the force of my argument, the latter by developing a new virtue epistemology. Here I consider both responses. I show first that Kelp mischaracterizes my challenge. Subsequently, I identify two new problems for Greco’s new virtue epistemology.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)963-970
Number of pages8
JournalErkenntnis
Volume78
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Critical discussion : virtue epistemology and extended cognition: a reply to Kelp and Greco'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this