Criteria for selecting design process modelling approaches

Jakob Trauer (Corresponding author), Ferdinand Wöhr, Claudia Eckert, Udo Kannengiesser, Sjoerd Knippenberg, Olga Sankowski, Markus Zimmermann

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
104 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Process models are among the principal artefacts used for managing design projects. However, the selection of effective modelling approaches can be difficult for design project managers, given that a plethora of tools exists for various modelling purposes. In addition to date no systematic approach for the assessment and selection of process modelling approaches is available to practitioners. This paper presents the development of criteria for benchmarking and selecting different process modelling tools. The results are based on three elements. (1) In a four-hour workshop undertaken by the Design Process SIG of the Design Society, bringing together around 20 international researchers and practitioners in design process modelling, an initial set of 58 criteria were brainstormed and consolidated during the workshop and in follow-up meetings. (2) The consolidated criteria were then compared with literature. The finalised criteria list was then validated by external experts in industry (3). The resulting list of 12 criteria provides a sound basis for practitioners to support a systematic selection of process modelling approaches. Further, it lays the foundation of a benchmarking tool, which is subject to future work.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)791-800
Number of pages10
JournalProceedings of the Design Society
Volume1
Issue numberICED21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021
Event23rd International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2021 - Gothenburg, Sweden
Duration: 16 Aug 202120 Aug 2021

Keywords

  • Benchmarking
  • Criteria
  • Decision making
  • Design process
  • Process modelling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Criteria for selecting design process modelling approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this