Correlation clustering

N. Bansal, A. Blum, S. Chawla

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    810 Citations (Scopus)


    We consider the following clustering problem: we have a complete graph on n vertices (items), where each edge (u, v) is labeled either + or – depending on whether u and v have been deemed to be similar or different. The goal is to produce a partition of the vertices (a clustering) that agrees as much as possible with the edge labels. That is, we want a clustering that maximizes the number of + edges within clusters, plus the number of – edges between clusters (equivalently, minimizes the number of disagreements: the number of – edges inside clusters plus the number of + edges between clusters). This formulation is motivated from a document clustering problem in which one has a pairwise similarity function f learned from past data, and the goal is to partition the current set of documents in a way that correlates with f as much as possible; it can also be viewed as a kind of agnostic learning problem. An interesting feature of this clustering formulation is that one does not need to specify the number of clusters k as a separate parameter, as in measures such as k-median or min-sum or min-max clustering. Instead, in our formulation, the optimal number of clusters could be any value between 1 and n, depending on the edge labels. We look at approximation algorithms for both minimizing disagreements and for maximizing agreements. For minimizing disagreements, we give a constant factor approximation. For maximizing agreements we give a PTAS, building on ideas of Goldreich, Goldwasser, and Ron (1998) and de la Veg (1996). We also show how to extend some of these results to graphs with edge labels in [–1, +1], and give some results for the case of random noise.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)89-113
    JournalMachine Learning
    Issue number1-3
    Publication statusPublished - 2004


    Dive into the research topics of 'Correlation clustering'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this