Contextual Integrity as a General Conceptual Tool for Evaluating Technological Change

Elizabeth O'Neill (Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
53 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The fast pace of technological change necessitates new evaluative and deliberative tools. This article develops a general, functional approach to evaluating technological change, inspired by Nissenbaum’s theory of contextual integrity. Nissenbaum (2009) introduced the concept of contextual integrity to help analyze how technological changes can produce privacy problems. Reinterpreted, the concept of contextual integrity can aid our thinking about how technological changes affect the full range of human concerns and values—not only privacy. I propose a generalized concept of contextual integrity that is applicable to a broader variety of circumstances, and I outline a new, general procedure for technological evaluation. Among the attractive features of the proposed approach to evaluating technological change are its context-sensitivity, adaptability, and principled presumptive conservatism, enabled by the mechanism the approach supplies for reevaluating existing practices, norms, and values.
Original languageEnglish
Article number79
Number of pages25
JournalPhilosophy & Technology
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2022

Keywords

  • Contextual integrity
  • Disruptive technologies
  • Ethics
  • Norms
  • Privacy
  • Values

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contextual Integrity as a General Conceptual Tool for Evaluating Technological Change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this