Contextual effects in the stimulus suffix paradigm

P. Ottley, S.M. Marcus, J. Morton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlePopular

4 Citations (Scopus)
28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Morton & Chambers (1976) showed that the suffix effect - a selective impairment in serial recall on the final serial position of an acoustically presented list - was crucially affected by whether the suffix was a speech sound or a non-speech sound. They also claimed that the classification of a sound as speech-like was determined simply by the acoustic properties of the sound and not at all by the context. The crucial sound in their experiments was a steady state, naturally produced vowel sound which failed to give a suffix effect. We report here that when the sound was the only suffix used, it did produce a suffix effect. We conclude that, contrary to Morton & Chambers' conclusion, context effects are indeed operative in determining whether a sound produces a suffix effect.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)383-387
JournalBritish Journal of Psychology
Volume73
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1982
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Contextual effects in the stimulus suffix paradigm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this