Conforming to an artificial majority: Persuasive effects of a group of artificial agents

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we propose a new perspective on persuasive technology: Persuasive effects of a group of artificial agents. We argue that while effects of single social agents have been corroborated, understanding of persuasion by multiple agents in a group setting is very limited. In the current research, we argue that conformity effects could occur not only with human majorities, but also with artificial majorities consisting of smart agents or computers. Two studies were conducted to investigate the conformity effect of group pressure on participants’ comparative judgments of lengths of lines, based on the classic Asch paradigm. Group pressure by human majorities was compared with pressure by majorities of boxed PC’s and of artificial virtual agents. Results indicated that normative pressure is limited to human majorities, while informational pressure can also be exerted by artificial majorities. This research revealed that applying majorities of artificial agents opens up a new domain of persuasive technology.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPersuasive Technology : 10th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2015, Chicago, IL, USA, June 3-5, 2015. Proceedings
EditorsT. MacTavish, S. Basapur
Place of PublicationCham
PublisherSpringer
Pages229-240
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)9783319203058
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Event10th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE 2015) - Chicago, United States
Duration: 3 Jun 20155 Jun 2015
Conference number: 10
https://www.id.iit.edu/persuasive2015/

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume9072
ISSN (Print)03029743
ISSN (Electronic)16113349

Conference

Conference10th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE 2015)
Abbreviated titlePERSUASIVE 2015
CountryUnited States
CityChicago
Period3/06/155/06/15
Internet address

Fingerprint

Persuasive Technology
Persuasion
Virtual Agents
Paradigm
Line
Human

Keywords

  • Artificial agent
  • Artificial majority
  • Conformity
  • Groups of artificial agents
  • Persuasive agents
  • Persuasive technology

Cite this

Midden, C. J. H., Ham, J. R. C., & Baten, J. (2015). Conforming to an artificial majority: Persuasive effects of a group of artificial agents. In T. MacTavish, & S. Basapur (Eds.), Persuasive Technology : 10th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2015, Chicago, IL, USA, June 3-5, 2015. Proceedings (pp. 229-240). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 9072). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_21
Midden, C.J.H. ; Ham, J.R.C. ; Baten, J. / Conforming to an artificial majority : Persuasive effects of a group of artificial agents. Persuasive Technology : 10th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2015, Chicago, IL, USA, June 3-5, 2015. Proceedings. editor / T. MacTavish ; S. Basapur. Cham : Springer, 2015. pp. 229-240 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)).
@inproceedings{a705d2734f74483d97bd4efda9a29027,
title = "Conforming to an artificial majority: Persuasive effects of a group of artificial agents",
abstract = "In this paper we propose a new perspective on persuasive technology: Persuasive effects of a group of artificial agents. We argue that while effects of single social agents have been corroborated, understanding of persuasion by multiple agents in a group setting is very limited. In the current research, we argue that conformity effects could occur not only with human majorities, but also with artificial majorities consisting of smart agents or computers. Two studies were conducted to investigate the conformity effect of group pressure on participants’ comparative judgments of lengths of lines, based on the classic Asch paradigm. Group pressure by human majorities was compared with pressure by majorities of boxed PC’s and of artificial virtual agents. Results indicated that normative pressure is limited to human majorities, while informational pressure can also be exerted by artificial majorities. This research revealed that applying majorities of artificial agents opens up a new domain of persuasive technology.",
keywords = "Artificial agent, Artificial majority, Conformity, Groups of artificial agents, Persuasive agents, Persuasive technology",
author = "C.J.H. Midden and J.R.C. Ham and J. Baten",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_21",
language = "English",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "229--240",
editor = "T. MacTavish and S. Basapur",
booktitle = "Persuasive Technology : 10th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2015, Chicago, IL, USA, June 3-5, 2015. Proceedings",
address = "Germany",

}

Midden, CJH, Ham, JRC & Baten, J 2015, Conforming to an artificial majority: Persuasive effects of a group of artificial agents. in T MacTavish & S Basapur (eds), Persuasive Technology : 10th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2015, Chicago, IL, USA, June 3-5, 2015. Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 9072, Springer, Cham, pp. 229-240, 10th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE 2015), Chicago, United States, 3/06/15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_21

Conforming to an artificial majority : Persuasive effects of a group of artificial agents. / Midden, C.J.H.; Ham, J.R.C.; Baten, J.

Persuasive Technology : 10th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2015, Chicago, IL, USA, June 3-5, 2015. Proceedings. ed. / T. MacTavish; S. Basapur. Cham : Springer, 2015. p. 229-240 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 9072).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Conforming to an artificial majority

T2 - Persuasive effects of a group of artificial agents

AU - Midden, C.J.H.

AU - Ham, J.R.C.

AU - Baten, J.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In this paper we propose a new perspective on persuasive technology: Persuasive effects of a group of artificial agents. We argue that while effects of single social agents have been corroborated, understanding of persuasion by multiple agents in a group setting is very limited. In the current research, we argue that conformity effects could occur not only with human majorities, but also with artificial majorities consisting of smart agents or computers. Two studies were conducted to investigate the conformity effect of group pressure on participants’ comparative judgments of lengths of lines, based on the classic Asch paradigm. Group pressure by human majorities was compared with pressure by majorities of boxed PC’s and of artificial virtual agents. Results indicated that normative pressure is limited to human majorities, while informational pressure can also be exerted by artificial majorities. This research revealed that applying majorities of artificial agents opens up a new domain of persuasive technology.

AB - In this paper we propose a new perspective on persuasive technology: Persuasive effects of a group of artificial agents. We argue that while effects of single social agents have been corroborated, understanding of persuasion by multiple agents in a group setting is very limited. In the current research, we argue that conformity effects could occur not only with human majorities, but also with artificial majorities consisting of smart agents or computers. Two studies were conducted to investigate the conformity effect of group pressure on participants’ comparative judgments of lengths of lines, based on the classic Asch paradigm. Group pressure by human majorities was compared with pressure by majorities of boxed PC’s and of artificial virtual agents. Results indicated that normative pressure is limited to human majorities, while informational pressure can also be exerted by artificial majorities. This research revealed that applying majorities of artificial agents opens up a new domain of persuasive technology.

KW - Artificial agent

KW - Artificial majority

KW - Conformity

KW - Groups of artificial agents

KW - Persuasive agents

KW - Persuasive technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937485070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_21

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_21

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84937485070

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

SP - 229

EP - 240

BT - Persuasive Technology : 10th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2015, Chicago, IL, USA, June 3-5, 2015. Proceedings

A2 - MacTavish, T.

A2 - Basapur, S.

PB - Springer

CY - Cham

ER -

Midden CJH, Ham JRC, Baten J. Conforming to an artificial majority: Persuasive effects of a group of artificial agents. In MacTavish T, Basapur S, editors, Persuasive Technology : 10th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2015, Chicago, IL, USA, June 3-5, 2015. Proceedings. Cham: Springer. 2015. p. 229-240. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_21