Abstract
Twice in the history of social psychology has there been a crisis of confidence. The first started in the 1960s and lasted until the end of the 1970s, and the second crisis dominated the 2010s. Drawing on extensive quotes from articles published during both crises, I examine the similarities and differences between these psychological crises. In this first of two articles, I focus on how researchers discussed fundamental concerns about the replicability of findings across the two crises. I reflect on five possible reasons why concerns about failed replications received more attention during the second crisis, the continuing lack of incentives to perform replication studies, and the importance of large-scale research projects to instigate change.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 5 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | International Review of Social Psychology |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 12 May 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 The Author(s).
Keywords
- ethics
- history of psychology
- methodology
- replication
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Concerns About Replicability Across Two Crises in Social Psychology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver