Abstract
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 270–279 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology |
Volume | 90 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 23 May 2017 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Compensating need satisfaction across life boundaries: a daily diary study. / Hewett, R.; Haun, V.C.; Demerouti, E.; Rodríguez Sánchez, A.M.; Skakon, J.; de Gieter, S.
In: Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 90, No. 2, 23.05.2017, p. 270–279 .Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Compensating need satisfaction across life boundaries: a daily diary study
AU - Hewett, R.
AU - Haun, V.C.
AU - Demerouti, E.
AU - Rodríguez Sánchez, A.M.
AU - Skakon, J.
AU - de Gieter, S.
PY - 2017/5/23
Y1 - 2017/5/23
N2 - Self-determination theory suggests that satisfaction of an individual's basic psychological needs (for competence, autonomy, and relatedness) is a key for well-being. This has gained empirical support in multiple life domains, but little is known about the way that need satisfaction interacts between work and home. Drawing from ideas of work–home compensation, we expect that the benefits of need satisfaction in the home domain are reduced when needs are satisfied in the work domain. We tested this hypothesis with a daily diary study involving 91 workers. Results showed that individuals particularly benefit from satisfaction of their need for competence in the home domain when it is not satisfied during the working day. No such interactions were found between the needs for autonomy or relatedness. Our study highlights that the interaction of need satisfaction across domains represents a boundary condition for the beneficial effects of need satisfaction.
AB - Self-determination theory suggests that satisfaction of an individual's basic psychological needs (for competence, autonomy, and relatedness) is a key for well-being. This has gained empirical support in multiple life domains, but little is known about the way that need satisfaction interacts between work and home. Drawing from ideas of work–home compensation, we expect that the benefits of need satisfaction in the home domain are reduced when needs are satisfied in the work domain. We tested this hypothesis with a daily diary study involving 91 workers. Results showed that individuals particularly benefit from satisfaction of their need for competence in the home domain when it is not satisfied during the working day. No such interactions were found between the needs for autonomy or relatedness. Our study highlights that the interaction of need satisfaction across domains represents a boundary condition for the beneficial effects of need satisfaction.
U2 - 10.1111/joop.12171
DO - 10.1111/joop.12171
M3 - Article
VL - 90
SP - 270
EP - 279
JO - Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
JF - Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
SN - 0963-1798
IS - 2
ER -