Abstract
Economic indicators, such as GDP, do not measure all dimensions of society's progress. Hundreds of alternative measurement systems have been proposed to measure sustainable development. This paper argues for harmonization of these methods, and facilitates this discussion by providing a detailed comparison of country-level measures. The analysis includes 55 systems (12 composite indicators and 43 sustainable development indicator (SDI) sets). The analysis shows that SDI sets are more common than composite indicators. This paper also shows that composite indicators generally focus on environmental themes, while SDI sets are broader in scope through inclusion of more social themes. Overall, we find a great degree of agreement on the most popular indicators and themes in SDI sets. However, we do find that certain indicators are more prevalent in higher and lower income countries. The article emphasizes the need for harmonization of measurement systems, but also shows the importance of flexibility at the country level. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 285-300 |
| Journal | Sustainable Development |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of measurement systems for sustainable development at the national level'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 48 Citations - based on content available in repository [source: Scopus]
- 1 Book
-
Well-being, sustainability and social development: The Netherlands 1850-2050
Lintsen, H. W., Veraart, F. C. A., Smits, J. P. H. & Grin, J., 14 Jun 2018, Cham: Springer. 572 p. (Philosophy of Nature; no. 1)Research output: Book/Report › Book › Academic
Open Access18 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver