Comparison of machine learning techniques for target detection.

J.P. Vink, G. Haan, de

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper focuses on machine learning techniques for real-time detection. Although many supervised learning techniques have been described in the literature, no technique always performs best. Several comparative studies are available, but have not always been performed carefully, leading to invalid conclusions. Since benchmarking all techniques is a tremendous task, literature has been used to limit the available options, selecting the two most promising techniques (AdaBoost and SVM), out of 11 different Machine Learning techniques. Based on a thorough comparison using 2 datasets and simulating noise in the feature set as well as in the labeling, AdaBoost is concluded to be the best machine learning technique for real-time target detection as its performance is comparable to SVM, its detection time is one or multiple orders of magnitude faster, its inherent feature selection eliminates this as a separate task, while it is more straightforward to use (only three coupled parameters to tune) and has a lower training time.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-139
Number of pages15
JournalArtificial Intelligence Review
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of machine learning techniques for target detection.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this