Comparison between the Eurocode for fatigue of steel structures, en 1993-1-9, and the Eurocode for fatigue of aluminium structures, en 1999-1-3

Johan Maljaars, Mladen Lukić, Frans Soetens

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The fatigue behaviour of aluminium shows not only many similarities, but also some differences with the fatigue behaviour of steel. There exist separate Eurocodes for the fatigue design of steel and of aluminium structures, EN1993-1-9 and EN1999-1-3, respectively. The latter standard was developed after the draft version of the first one was available. However, a number of aspects are considered in a different way in the two standards. Are these differences justified and desired? What can we learn from the two standards for future improvement of the documents? This paper presents and discusses the agreements and differences between the two Eurocodes. The paper evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of the approaches adopted in one or another of the two standards. It may serve as a starting point for future harmonization of the two standards.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication5th Fatigue Design Conference, Fatigue Design 2013, 27-28 November 2013, Senlise, France
PublisherElsevier
Pages34-48
Number of pages15
Volume66
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2013
Event5th International Conference on Fatigue Design, Fatigue Design 2013 - Senlis, France
Duration: 27 Nov 201328 Nov 2013

Publication series

NameProcedia Engineering
Volume66
ISSN (Print)1877-7058

Conference

Conference5th International Conference on Fatigue Design, Fatigue Design 2013
CountryFrance
CitySenlis
Period27/11/1328/11/13

Fingerprint

Steel structures
Fatigue of materials
Aluminum
Steel

Keywords

  • Aluminium
  • Fatigue
  • Fracture mechanics
  • Steel
  • Welded joints

Cite this

Maljaars, J., Lukić, M., & Soetens, F. (2013). Comparison between the Eurocode for fatigue of steel structures, en 1993-1-9, and the Eurocode for fatigue of aluminium structures, en 1999-1-3. In 5th Fatigue Design Conference, Fatigue Design 2013, 27-28 November 2013, Senlise, France (Vol. 66, pp. 34-48). (Procedia Engineering; Vol. 66). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.060
Maljaars, Johan ; Lukić, Mladen ; Soetens, Frans. / Comparison between the Eurocode for fatigue of steel structures, en 1993-1-9, and the Eurocode for fatigue of aluminium structures, en 1999-1-3. 5th Fatigue Design Conference, Fatigue Design 2013, 27-28 November 2013, Senlise, France. Vol. 66 Elsevier, 2013. pp. 34-48 (Procedia Engineering).
@inproceedings{33ee7467e982477c86632679b45054cb,
title = "Comparison between the Eurocode for fatigue of steel structures, en 1993-1-9, and the Eurocode for fatigue of aluminium structures, en 1999-1-3",
abstract = "The fatigue behaviour of aluminium shows not only many similarities, but also some differences with the fatigue behaviour of steel. There exist separate Eurocodes for the fatigue design of steel and of aluminium structures, EN1993-1-9 and EN1999-1-3, respectively. The latter standard was developed after the draft version of the first one was available. However, a number of aspects are considered in a different way in the two standards. Are these differences justified and desired? What can we learn from the two standards for future improvement of the documents? This paper presents and discusses the agreements and differences between the two Eurocodes. The paper evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of the approaches adopted in one or another of the two standards. It may serve as a starting point for future harmonization of the two standards.",
keywords = "Aluminium, Fatigue, Fracture mechanics, Steel, Welded joints",
author = "Johan Maljaars and Mladen Lukić and Frans Soetens",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.060",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
series = "Procedia Engineering",
publisher = "Elsevier",
pages = "34--48",
booktitle = "5th Fatigue Design Conference, Fatigue Design 2013, 27-28 November 2013, Senlise, France",
address = "Netherlands",

}

Maljaars, J, Lukić, M & Soetens, F 2013, Comparison between the Eurocode for fatigue of steel structures, en 1993-1-9, and the Eurocode for fatigue of aluminium structures, en 1999-1-3. in 5th Fatigue Design Conference, Fatigue Design 2013, 27-28 November 2013, Senlise, France. vol. 66, Procedia Engineering, vol. 66, Elsevier, pp. 34-48, 5th International Conference on Fatigue Design, Fatigue Design 2013, Senlis, France, 27/11/13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.060

Comparison between the Eurocode for fatigue of steel structures, en 1993-1-9, and the Eurocode for fatigue of aluminium structures, en 1999-1-3. / Maljaars, Johan; Lukić, Mladen; Soetens, Frans.

5th Fatigue Design Conference, Fatigue Design 2013, 27-28 November 2013, Senlise, France. Vol. 66 Elsevier, 2013. p. 34-48 (Procedia Engineering; Vol. 66).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison between the Eurocode for fatigue of steel structures, en 1993-1-9, and the Eurocode for fatigue of aluminium structures, en 1999-1-3

AU - Maljaars, Johan

AU - Lukić, Mladen

AU - Soetens, Frans

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - The fatigue behaviour of aluminium shows not only many similarities, but also some differences with the fatigue behaviour of steel. There exist separate Eurocodes for the fatigue design of steel and of aluminium structures, EN1993-1-9 and EN1999-1-3, respectively. The latter standard was developed after the draft version of the first one was available. However, a number of aspects are considered in a different way in the two standards. Are these differences justified and desired? What can we learn from the two standards for future improvement of the documents? This paper presents and discusses the agreements and differences between the two Eurocodes. The paper evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of the approaches adopted in one or another of the two standards. It may serve as a starting point for future harmonization of the two standards.

AB - The fatigue behaviour of aluminium shows not only many similarities, but also some differences with the fatigue behaviour of steel. There exist separate Eurocodes for the fatigue design of steel and of aluminium structures, EN1993-1-9 and EN1999-1-3, respectively. The latter standard was developed after the draft version of the first one was available. However, a number of aspects are considered in a different way in the two standards. Are these differences justified and desired? What can we learn from the two standards for future improvement of the documents? This paper presents and discusses the agreements and differences between the two Eurocodes. The paper evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of the approaches adopted in one or another of the two standards. It may serve as a starting point for future harmonization of the two standards.

KW - Aluminium

KW - Fatigue

KW - Fracture mechanics

KW - Steel

KW - Welded joints

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894438848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.060

DO - 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.060

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 66

T3 - Procedia Engineering

SP - 34

EP - 48

BT - 5th Fatigue Design Conference, Fatigue Design 2013, 27-28 November 2013, Senlise, France

PB - Elsevier

ER -

Maljaars J, Lukić M, Soetens F. Comparison between the Eurocode for fatigue of steel structures, en 1993-1-9, and the Eurocode for fatigue of aluminium structures, en 1999-1-3. In 5th Fatigue Design Conference, Fatigue Design 2013, 27-28 November 2013, Senlise, France. Vol. 66. Elsevier. 2013. p. 34-48. (Procedia Engineering). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.060