Comparison and analysis of expert and student views on the use of energy scenarios in communication on fusion research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article compares expert framings on energy models in order to improve communication on energy scenarios. It gives a brief theoretical elaboration on the framing concept in science and the consequences for modelling. From these insights we look into the use of energy models in communication on fusion energy decision-making. We discuss results of interviews with international energy modelling experts. We conclude that the framings of the experts are very different. We see this variety as a strength that should be exploited more to benefit the communication on fusion research. As a first step to further research in the interaction between experts and the public, we have a focus group with students. The results of both groups are often similar. However, some expert framings are narrower compared to the students which might complicate the communication. We recommend more research on expert framing in modelling.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2872-2878
Number of pages7
JournalFusion Engineering and Design
Volume82
Issue number15-24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fusion reactions
Students
Communication
Decision making

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Energy model
  • Expert
  • Framing
  • Interview

Cite this

@article{40d80814caf646899833891308adabde,
title = "Comparison and analysis of expert and student views on the use of energy scenarios in communication on fusion research",
abstract = "This article compares expert framings on energy models in order to improve communication on energy scenarios. It gives a brief theoretical elaboration on the framing concept in science and the consequences for modelling. From these insights we look into the use of energy models in communication on fusion energy decision-making. We discuss results of interviews with international energy modelling experts. We conclude that the framings of the experts are very different. We see this variety as a strength that should be exploited more to benefit the communication on fusion research. As a first step to further research in the interaction between experts and the public, we have a focus group with students. The results of both groups are often similar. However, some expert framings are narrower compared to the students which might complicate the communication. We recommend more research on expert framing in modelling.",
keywords = "Communication, Energy model, Expert, Framing, Interview",
author = "Gunter Bombaerts and Erik Laes",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.07.016",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "2872--2878",
journal = "Fusion Engineering and Design",
issn = "0920-3796",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "15-24",

}

Comparison and analysis of expert and student views on the use of energy scenarios in communication on fusion research. / Bombaerts, Gunter; Laes, Erik.

In: Fusion Engineering and Design, Vol. 82, No. 15-24, 01.10.2007, p. 2872-2878.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison and analysis of expert and student views on the use of energy scenarios in communication on fusion research

AU - Bombaerts, Gunter

AU - Laes, Erik

PY - 2007/10/1

Y1 - 2007/10/1

N2 - This article compares expert framings on energy models in order to improve communication on energy scenarios. It gives a brief theoretical elaboration on the framing concept in science and the consequences for modelling. From these insights we look into the use of energy models in communication on fusion energy decision-making. We discuss results of interviews with international energy modelling experts. We conclude that the framings of the experts are very different. We see this variety as a strength that should be exploited more to benefit the communication on fusion research. As a first step to further research in the interaction between experts and the public, we have a focus group with students. The results of both groups are often similar. However, some expert framings are narrower compared to the students which might complicate the communication. We recommend more research on expert framing in modelling.

AB - This article compares expert framings on energy models in order to improve communication on energy scenarios. It gives a brief theoretical elaboration on the framing concept in science and the consequences for modelling. From these insights we look into the use of energy models in communication on fusion energy decision-making. We discuss results of interviews with international energy modelling experts. We conclude that the framings of the experts are very different. We see this variety as a strength that should be exploited more to benefit the communication on fusion research. As a first step to further research in the interaction between experts and the public, we have a focus group with students. The results of both groups are often similar. However, some expert framings are narrower compared to the students which might complicate the communication. We recommend more research on expert framing in modelling.

KW - Communication

KW - Energy model

KW - Expert

KW - Framing

KW - Interview

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34948865174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.07.016

DO - 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.07.016

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34948865174

VL - 82

SP - 2872

EP - 2878

JO - Fusion Engineering and Design

JF - Fusion Engineering and Design

SN - 0920-3796

IS - 15-24

ER -