Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparing Speed and Accuracy of Fast Alternatives to CFD for Ventilation Design

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Ventilation design choices influence the indoor air quality and comfort of the occupants. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is frequently used to obtain detailed spatial information which can aid in ventilation design. However, CFD is not commonly used due its computational cost and the high level of numerical expertise required. Fast numerical methods (FNMs), such as voxel-based CFD (vCFD) and coarse grid CFD (cCFD), are potentially more cost-effective and easier to implement. In this research, the speed and accuracy of CFD, vCFD and cCFD are compared for a displacement ventilation case. The FNMs are shown to be at least three orders of magnitude faster. CFD yields more accurate results but both vCFD and cCFD capture flow characteristics of the displacement ventilation case. The results suggest that the integration of FNMs in the early design phase may improve ventilation design quality at an acceptable cost.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication17th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, INDOOR AIR 2022
PublisherInternational Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate (ISIAQ)
Pages982-989
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jun 2022
Event17th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, INDOOR AIR 2022 - Kuopio, Finland
Duration: 12 Jun 202216 Jun 2022

Conference

Conference17th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, INDOOR AIR 2022
Country/TerritoryFinland
CityKuopio
Period12/06/2216/06/22

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the partnership with ANSYS. The authors acknowledge the support of the Flemish Agency for Innovation and Entrepreneurship (VLAIO) in the Flux50 project Smart Ventilation (HBC.2020.2520).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 17th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, INDOOR AIR 2022. All rights reserved.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the partnership with ANSYS. The authors acknowledge the support of the Flemish Agency for Innovation and Entrepreneurship (VLAIO) in the Flux50 project Smart Ventilation (HBC.2020.2520).

Keywords

  • computational fluid dynamics
  • Fast numerical methods
  • mesh-based modeling
  • ventilation design
  • voxel-based modeling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing Speed and Accuracy of Fast Alternatives to CFD for Ventilation Design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this