Comparing institutional strategies for engineering ethics education in regional, national and European contexts

Gunter Bombaerts; Luis Adriano; Shannon Chance; Čuba Václav; Mihály  Héder; Sarah Junaid; Alexandra Kazakova; Helena Kovacs; Thomas Lennerfors; Diana Martin; Amirouche Moktefi; Alfredo Soeiro; Andrei Simionescu-Panait; Mircea Tboșaru; Roland Tormey; Horațiu Vermeșan

Comparing institutional strategies for engineering ethics education in regional, national and European contexts

Gunter Bombaerts
, Luis Adriano
, Shannon Chance
, Čuba Václav
, Mihály Héder
, Sarah Junaid
, Alexandra Kazakova
, Helena Kovacs
, Thomas Lennerfors
, Diana Martin
, Amirouche Moktefi
, Alfredo Soeiro
, Andrei Simionescu-Panait
, Mircea Tboșaru
, Roland Tormey
, Horațiu Vermeșan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

This paper describes, at raw-data level, the results of a workshop at SEFI 2021 on “comparing institutional strategies for engineering ethics education in regional, national and European contexts”. It uses the curriculum typology of Goodlad. The results indicate the diversity of answers at the European scale for the ideal, formal, perceived and operational curriculum. Although there were some first contextual differences noticeable, the set of answers was too small to give an in-depth analysis, but it opens up a promising area for future research.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the SEFI 2021 Conference Blended Learning in Engineering Education: challenging, enlightening – and lasting?
Editors	Hans-Ulrich Heiss, Hannu-Matti Jarvinen, Annette Mayer, Alexandra Schulz
Publisher	European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI)
Pages	1510-1519
Number of pages	10
ISBN (Electronic)	978-2-87352-023-6
Publication status	Published - 2021
Event	49th SEFI Annual Conference: Blended Learning in Engineering Education: Challenging, Enlightening - and Lasting? - Online, Virtual, Berlin, Germany Duration: 13 Sept 2021 → 16 Sept 2021 Conference number: 49 https://sefi2021.eu/

Conference

Conference	49th SEFI Annual Conference: Blended Learning in Engineering Education: Challenging, Enlightening - and Lasting?
Abbreviated title	SEFI 2021
Country/Territory	Germany
City	Berlin
Period	13/09/21 → 16/09/21
Internet address	https://sefi2021.eu/

Keywords

engineering ethics education
Context
Ethics
Europe
Institution
Goodlad

Access to Document

https://www.sefi.be/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/SEFI49th-Proceedings-final.pdf

Cite this

Bombaerts, G., Adriano, L., Chance, S., Václav, Č., Héder, M., Junaid, S., Kazakova, A., Kovacs, H., Lennerfors, T., Martin, D., Moktefi, A., Soeiro, A., Simionescu-Panait, A., Tboșaru, M., Tormey, R., & Vermeșan, H. (2021). Comparing institutional strategies for engineering ethics education in regional, national and European contexts. In H.-U. Heiss, H.-M. Jarvinen, A. Mayer, & A. Schulz (Eds.), Proceedings of the SEFI 2021 Conference Blended Learning in Engineering Education: challenging, enlightening – and lasting? (pp. 1510-1519). European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI). https://www.sefi.be/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/SEFI49th-Proceedings-final.pdf

Bombaerts, Gunter ; Adriano, Luis ; Chance, Shannon et al. / Comparing institutional strategies for engineering ethics education in regional, national and European contexts. Proceedings of the SEFI 2021 Conference Blended Learning in Engineering Education: challenging, enlightening – and lasting?. editor / Hans-Ulrich Heiss ; Hannu-Matti Jarvinen ; Annette Mayer ; Alexandra Schulz. European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), 2021. pp. 1510-1519

@inproceedings{6932c138d4cc455db61acfda7d5889b5,

title = "Comparing institutional strategies for engineering ethics education in regional, national and European contexts",

abstract = "This paper describes, at raw-data level, the results of a workshop at SEFI 2021 on “comparing institutional strategies for engineering ethics education in regional, national and European contexts”. It uses the curriculum typology of Goodlad. The results indicate the diversity of answers at the European scale for the ideal, formal, perceived and operational curriculum. Although there were some first contextual differences noticeable, the set of answers was too small to give an in-depth analysis, but it opens up a promising area for future research.",

keywords = "engineering ethics education, Context, Ethics, Europe, Institution, Goodlad",

author = "Gunter Bombaerts and Luis Adriano and Shannon Chance and {\v C}uba V{\'a}clav and Mih{\'a}ly H{\'e}der and Sarah Junaid and Alexandra Kazakova and Helena Kovacs and Thomas Lennerfors and Diana Martin and Amirouche Moktefi and Alfredo Soeiro and Andrei Simionescu-Panait and Mircea Tboșaru and Roland Tormey and Horațiu Vermeșan",

year = "2021",

language = "English",

pages = "1510--1519",

editor = "Hans-Ulrich Heiss and Hannu-Matti Jarvinen and Annette Mayer and Alexandra Schulz",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the SEFI 2021 Conference Blended Learning in Engineering Education: challenging, enlightening – and lasting?",

publisher = "European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI)",

note = "49th SEFI Annual Conference: Blended Learning in Engineering Education: Challenging, Enlightening - and Lasting?, SEFI 2021 ; Conference date: 13-09-2021 Through 16-09-2021",

url = "https://sefi2021.eu/",

}

Bombaerts, G, Adriano, L, Chance, S, Václav, Č, Héder, M, Junaid, S, Kazakova, A, Kovacs, H, Lennerfors, T, Martin, D, Moktefi, A, Soeiro, A, Simionescu-Panait, A, Tboșaru, M, Tormey, R & Vermeșan, H 2021, Comparing institutional strategies for engineering ethics education in regional, national and European contexts. in H-U Heiss, H-M Jarvinen, A Mayer & A Schulz (eds), Proceedings of the SEFI 2021 Conference Blended Learning in Engineering Education: challenging, enlightening – and lasting?. European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), pp. 1510-1519, 49th SEFI Annual Conference: Blended Learning in Engineering Education: Challenging, Enlightening - and Lasting?, Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 13/09/21. <https://www.sefi.be/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/SEFI49th-Proceedings-final.pdf>

Comparing institutional strategies for engineering ethics education in regional, national and European contexts. / Bombaerts, Gunter; Adriano, Luis; Chance, Shannon et al.
Proceedings of the SEFI 2021 Conference Blended Learning in Engineering Education: challenging, enlightening – and lasting?. ed. / Hans-Ulrich Heiss; Hannu-Matti Jarvinen; Annette Mayer; Alexandra Schulz. European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), 2021. p. 1510-1519.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparing institutional strategies for engineering ethics education in regional, national and European contexts

AU - Bombaerts, Gunter

AU - Adriano, Luis

AU - Chance, Shannon

AU - Václav, Čuba

AU - Héder, Mihály

AU - Junaid, Sarah

AU - Kazakova, Alexandra

AU - Kovacs, Helena

AU - Lennerfors, Thomas

AU - Martin, Diana

AU - Moktefi, Amirouche

AU - Soeiro, Alfredo

AU - Simionescu-Panait, Andrei

AU - Tboșaru, Mircea

AU - Tormey, Roland

AU - Vermeșan, Horațiu

N1 - Conference code: 49

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - This paper describes, at raw-data level, the results of a workshop at SEFI 2021 on “comparing institutional strategies for engineering ethics education in regional, national and European contexts”. It uses the curriculum typology of Goodlad. The results indicate the diversity of answers at the European scale for the ideal, formal, perceived and operational curriculum. Although there were some first contextual differences noticeable, the set of answers was too small to give an in-depth analysis, but it opens up a promising area for future research.

AB - This paper describes, at raw-data level, the results of a workshop at SEFI 2021 on “comparing institutional strategies for engineering ethics education in regional, national and European contexts”. It uses the curriculum typology of Goodlad. The results indicate the diversity of answers at the European scale for the ideal, formal, perceived and operational curriculum. Although there were some first contextual differences noticeable, the set of answers was too small to give an in-depth analysis, but it opens up a promising area for future research.

KW - engineering ethics education

KW - Context

KW - Ethics

KW - Europe

KW - Institution

KW - Goodlad

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85122916216

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 1510

EP - 1519

BT - Proceedings of the SEFI 2021 Conference Blended Learning in Engineering Education: challenging, enlightening – and lasting?

A2 - Heiss, Hans-Ulrich

A2 - Jarvinen, Hannu-Matti

A2 - Mayer, Annette

A2 - Schulz, Alexandra

PB - European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI)

T2 - 49th SEFI Annual Conference: Blended Learning in Engineering Education: Challenging, Enlightening - and Lasting?

Y2 - 13 September 2021 through 16 September 2021

ER -

Bombaerts G, Adriano L, Chance S, Václav Č, Héder M, Junaid S et al. Comparing institutional strategies for engineering ethics education in regional, national and European contexts. In Heiss HU, Jarvinen HM, Mayer A, Schulz A, editors, Proceedings of the SEFI 2021 Conference Blended Learning in Engineering Education: challenging, enlightening – and lasting?. European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI). 2021. p. 1510-1519

Comparing institutional strategies for engineering ethics education in regional, national and European contexts

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this