Comparative study on the effects of inlet heating, inlet boosting, and double-injection strategy on partially premixed combustion

Jinlin Han (Corresponding author), Shuli Wang, Bart Somers

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleAcademicpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Partially premixed combustion (PPC) is a low temperature combustion (LTC) concept which can relieve soot-NO x trade-off without sacrificing efficiency. However, at low load operating range, PPC with low reactivity fuel generally undergoes long ignition delay, which gives rise to high pressure rise rate, fast heat release and even misfires. To solve these problems and maintain high efficiency simultaneously, inlet heating, inlet boosting and double-injection strategy are experimentally investigated in a heavy-duty engine. BH80 (80vol% n-butanol and 20vol% n-heptane) are blended and tested at 8 bar gIMEP in PPC mode. Inlet heating (from 40 o C to 100 o C), inlet boosting (from 1.4 bar to 2.5 bar) and a double-injection strategy (pilot/main injection) are attempted to reduce the maximum pressure rise rate (PRRmax). The results show that all three methods can achieve negligible soot emissions. Moreover, a correlation between global temperature at TDC and ignition delay is noticed. In other words, high global temperature after compression stroke makes BH80 easier to ignite. As a consequence, the ignition delay shortens and the maximum pressure rise rate decreases. Compared to inlet heating and inlet boosting, the double-injection strategy shows more advantages in reducing pressure rise rates and obtaining high gross indicated efficiency (GIE). Specifically, with a well-tuned double-injection strategy, 3.6 bar/ o CA PRRmax and 49.5% GIE are achieved. In addition, when more fuel is injected in the pilot injection pulse, NO x emissions are significantly decreased. However, a longer pilot pulse also produces more CO and HC emissions and leads to lower combustion efficiency.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2019-01-1149
Number of pages12
JournalSAE Technical Papers
Volume2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Apr 2019
EventSAE World Congress Experience, WCX 2019 - Cobo Hall, Detroit, United States
Duration: 9 Apr 201911 Apr 2019
https://www.sae.org/attend/wcx/

Fingerprint

Heating
Ignition
Soot
Heptane
Butenes
Temperature
Engines

Cite this

@article{57a9ca8011384389b5bff673e6c5fc7f,
title = "Comparative study on the effects of inlet heating, inlet boosting, and double-injection strategy on partially premixed combustion",
abstract = "Partially premixed combustion (PPC) is a low temperature combustion (LTC) concept which can relieve soot-NO x trade-off without sacrificing efficiency. However, at low load operating range, PPC with low reactivity fuel generally undergoes long ignition delay, which gives rise to high pressure rise rate, fast heat release and even misfires. To solve these problems and maintain high efficiency simultaneously, inlet heating, inlet boosting and double-injection strategy are experimentally investigated in a heavy-duty engine. BH80 (80vol{\%} n-butanol and 20vol{\%} n-heptane) are blended and tested at 8 bar gIMEP in PPC mode. Inlet heating (from 40 o C to 100 o C), inlet boosting (from 1.4 bar to 2.5 bar) and a double-injection strategy (pilot/main injection) are attempted to reduce the maximum pressure rise rate (PRRmax). The results show that all three methods can achieve negligible soot emissions. Moreover, a correlation between global temperature at TDC and ignition delay is noticed. In other words, high global temperature after compression stroke makes BH80 easier to ignite. As a consequence, the ignition delay shortens and the maximum pressure rise rate decreases. Compared to inlet heating and inlet boosting, the double-injection strategy shows more advantages in reducing pressure rise rates and obtaining high gross indicated efficiency (GIE). Specifically, with a well-tuned double-injection strategy, 3.6 bar/ o CA PRRmax and 49.5{\%} GIE are achieved. In addition, when more fuel is injected in the pilot injection pulse, NO x emissions are significantly decreased. However, a longer pilot pulse also produces more CO and HC emissions and leads to lower combustion efficiency.",
author = "Jinlin Han and Shuli Wang and Bart Somers",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "2",
doi = "10.4271/2019-01-1149",
language = "English",
volume = "2019",
journal = "SAE Technical Papers",
issn = "0148-7191",
publisher = "Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE)",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative study on the effects of inlet heating, inlet boosting, and double-injection strategy on partially premixed combustion

AU - Han, Jinlin

AU - Wang, Shuli

AU - Somers, Bart

PY - 2019/4/2

Y1 - 2019/4/2

N2 - Partially premixed combustion (PPC) is a low temperature combustion (LTC) concept which can relieve soot-NO x trade-off without sacrificing efficiency. However, at low load operating range, PPC with low reactivity fuel generally undergoes long ignition delay, which gives rise to high pressure rise rate, fast heat release and even misfires. To solve these problems and maintain high efficiency simultaneously, inlet heating, inlet boosting and double-injection strategy are experimentally investigated in a heavy-duty engine. BH80 (80vol% n-butanol and 20vol% n-heptane) are blended and tested at 8 bar gIMEP in PPC mode. Inlet heating (from 40 o C to 100 o C), inlet boosting (from 1.4 bar to 2.5 bar) and a double-injection strategy (pilot/main injection) are attempted to reduce the maximum pressure rise rate (PRRmax). The results show that all three methods can achieve negligible soot emissions. Moreover, a correlation between global temperature at TDC and ignition delay is noticed. In other words, high global temperature after compression stroke makes BH80 easier to ignite. As a consequence, the ignition delay shortens and the maximum pressure rise rate decreases. Compared to inlet heating and inlet boosting, the double-injection strategy shows more advantages in reducing pressure rise rates and obtaining high gross indicated efficiency (GIE). Specifically, with a well-tuned double-injection strategy, 3.6 bar/ o CA PRRmax and 49.5% GIE are achieved. In addition, when more fuel is injected in the pilot injection pulse, NO x emissions are significantly decreased. However, a longer pilot pulse also produces more CO and HC emissions and leads to lower combustion efficiency.

AB - Partially premixed combustion (PPC) is a low temperature combustion (LTC) concept which can relieve soot-NO x trade-off without sacrificing efficiency. However, at low load operating range, PPC with low reactivity fuel generally undergoes long ignition delay, which gives rise to high pressure rise rate, fast heat release and even misfires. To solve these problems and maintain high efficiency simultaneously, inlet heating, inlet boosting and double-injection strategy are experimentally investigated in a heavy-duty engine. BH80 (80vol% n-butanol and 20vol% n-heptane) are blended and tested at 8 bar gIMEP in PPC mode. Inlet heating (from 40 o C to 100 o C), inlet boosting (from 1.4 bar to 2.5 bar) and a double-injection strategy (pilot/main injection) are attempted to reduce the maximum pressure rise rate (PRRmax). The results show that all three methods can achieve negligible soot emissions. Moreover, a correlation between global temperature at TDC and ignition delay is noticed. In other words, high global temperature after compression stroke makes BH80 easier to ignite. As a consequence, the ignition delay shortens and the maximum pressure rise rate decreases. Compared to inlet heating and inlet boosting, the double-injection strategy shows more advantages in reducing pressure rise rates and obtaining high gross indicated efficiency (GIE). Specifically, with a well-tuned double-injection strategy, 3.6 bar/ o CA PRRmax and 49.5% GIE are achieved. In addition, when more fuel is injected in the pilot injection pulse, NO x emissions are significantly decreased. However, a longer pilot pulse also produces more CO and HC emissions and leads to lower combustion efficiency.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064628382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4271/2019-01-1149

DO - 10.4271/2019-01-1149

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:85064628382

VL - 2019

JO - SAE Technical Papers

JF - SAE Technical Papers

SN - 0148-7191

M1 - 2019-01-1149

ER -