Comparative efficacy of house dust mite extermination products

G. Schober, F.M. Kniest, H.S.M. Kort, D.M.O.G. Saint Georges Gridelet, de, J.E.M.H. Bronswijk, van

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleProfessional

17 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The acaricidal efficacy of nine marketed products, i.e. Acardust, Acarosan (foam and powder), Actelic 50, Artilin 3A (spirit and water base), liquid nitrogen, Paragerm AK, and Tymasil, and of intensive vacuum-cleaning have been compared on four different test surfaces: mattress, tufted carpet, gypsum board and rough wooden board, all covered with artificial house dust. They were inoculated with the house dust mite, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus or the house-dust fungus Aspergillus repens for evaluation of the fungistatic claims of some products. The acaricidal activity ofTymasil did not surpass that of vacuuming; its fungistatic effect was not apparent. The other products showed complete to almost complete eradication on at least one of the substrates tested. Taking into account the results of acaricidal efficacy as well as the data on safety and practicality acquired earlier, Acarosan powder was considered first choice for carpet treatment. Acarosan and liquid nitrogen, were found to be effective in the treatment of mattress, pillow, upholstered furniture and heavy curtains. On wooden surfaces Acarosan was found to be both effective and safe, while Acardust, Actelic 50, Artilin 3A (both fungistatic as well as acaricidal), liquid nitrogen and Paragerm also passed the efficiency test.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)618-626
Number of pages9
JournalClinical and Experimental Dermatology
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1992

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative efficacy of house dust mite extermination products'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this