Comparative analysis of different tube models for linear rheology of monodisperse linear entangled polymers

Volha Shchetnikava (Corresponding author), Johan Slot, Evelyne van Ruymbeke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim of the present paper is to analyse the differences between tube-based models which are widely used for predicting the linear viscoelasticity of monodisperse linear polymers, in comparison to a large set of experimental data. The following models are examined: Milner-McLeish, Likhtman-McLeish, the Hierarchical model proposed by the group of Larson, the BoB model of Das and Read, and the TMA model proposed by the group of van Ruymbeke. This comparison allows us to highlight and discuss important questions related to the relaxation of entangled polymers, such as the importance of the contour-length fluctuations (CLF) process and how it affects the reptation mechanism, or the contribution of the constraint release (CR) process on the motion of the chains. In particular, it allows us to point out important approximations, inherent in some models, which result in an overestimation of the effect of CLF on the reptation time. On the contrary, by validating the TMA model against experimental data, we show that this effect is underestimated in TMA. Therefore, in order to obtain accurate predictions, a novel modification to the TMA model is proposed. Our current work is a continuation of earlier research (Shchetnikava et al., 2014), where a similar analysis is performed on well-defined star polymers.

Original languageEnglish
Article number754
Number of pages30
JournalPolymers
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Keywords

  • Entangled polymer melts
  • Linear chains
  • Rheology
  • Tube model

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative analysis of different tube models for linear rheology of monodisperse linear entangled polymers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this