Community participation in cultural heritage management: a systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices

Ji Li (Corresponding author), Sukanya Krishnamurthy, Ana Pereira Roders, Pieter van Wesemael

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Community participation is an essential issue in heritage management. The international heritage organisation ICCROM published a guidance document discussing people-centred approaches to heritage management in 2015. Cultural heritage management is recommended to be carried out through a community participation process. Despite the growing literature on community participation in cultural heritage management, little research has been done on comparing Chinese to international approaches. Although in China several pilot projects have conducted effective community participation and achieved excellent outcomes. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing an overview that compares and discusses the similarities and differences between Chinese and international approaches. A systematic literature review of the state-of-the-art was conducted to explore these differences based on four themes: engaged communities, participatory methods, degrees of participation and steps taken within cultural heritage management. This review concludes both Chinese and international practices seek to collaborate with and empower local communities in their approaches, with Chinese pilot cases, such as Tianzifang in Shanghai. However, in general, Chinese cultural heritage management is government-led, in which community participation is happening to a minimal degree. China is encouraged to learn from international practices when developing contextualised management approaches, to better face the challenges of rapid urbanisation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102476
Number of pages9
JournalCities
Volume96
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020

Fingerprint

local participation
cultural heritage
literature review
participation
management
community
China
pilot project
literature
Community participation
Literature review
Cultural heritage
urbanization
Heritage

Keywords

  • China
  • Community participation
  • Cultural heritage
  • Literature review
  • Management approach

Cite this

@article{ee50489d7a7044f797cc2e9d7a5a2fd9,
title = "Community participation in cultural heritage management: a systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices",
abstract = "Community participation is an essential issue in heritage management. The international heritage organisation ICCROM published a guidance document discussing people-centred approaches to heritage management in 2015. Cultural heritage management is recommended to be carried out through a community participation process. Despite the growing literature on community participation in cultural heritage management, little research has been done on comparing Chinese to international approaches. Although in China several pilot projects have conducted effective community participation and achieved excellent outcomes. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing an overview that compares and discusses the similarities and differences between Chinese and international approaches. A systematic literature review of the state-of-the-art was conducted to explore these differences based on four themes: engaged communities, participatory methods, degrees of participation and steps taken within cultural heritage management. This review concludes both Chinese and international practices seek to collaborate with and empower local communities in their approaches, with Chinese pilot cases, such as Tianzifang in Shanghai. However, in general, Chinese cultural heritage management is government-led, in which community participation is happening to a minimal degree. China is encouraged to learn from international practices when developing contextualised management approaches, to better face the challenges of rapid urbanisation.",
keywords = "China, Community participation, Cultural heritage, Literature review, Management approach",
author = "Ji Li and Sukanya Krishnamurthy and {Pereira Roders}, Ana and {van Wesemael}, Pieter",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cities.2019.102476",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
journal = "Cities",
issn = "0264-2751",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Community participation in cultural heritage management : a systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices. / Li, Ji (Corresponding author); Krishnamurthy, Sukanya; Pereira Roders, Ana; van Wesemael, Pieter.

In: Cities, Vol. 96, 102476, 01.01.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Community participation in cultural heritage management

T2 - a systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices

AU - Li, Ji

AU - Krishnamurthy, Sukanya

AU - Pereira Roders, Ana

AU - van Wesemael, Pieter

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - Community participation is an essential issue in heritage management. The international heritage organisation ICCROM published a guidance document discussing people-centred approaches to heritage management in 2015. Cultural heritage management is recommended to be carried out through a community participation process. Despite the growing literature on community participation in cultural heritage management, little research has been done on comparing Chinese to international approaches. Although in China several pilot projects have conducted effective community participation and achieved excellent outcomes. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing an overview that compares and discusses the similarities and differences between Chinese and international approaches. A systematic literature review of the state-of-the-art was conducted to explore these differences based on four themes: engaged communities, participatory methods, degrees of participation and steps taken within cultural heritage management. This review concludes both Chinese and international practices seek to collaborate with and empower local communities in their approaches, with Chinese pilot cases, such as Tianzifang in Shanghai. However, in general, Chinese cultural heritage management is government-led, in which community participation is happening to a minimal degree. China is encouraged to learn from international practices when developing contextualised management approaches, to better face the challenges of rapid urbanisation.

AB - Community participation is an essential issue in heritage management. The international heritage organisation ICCROM published a guidance document discussing people-centred approaches to heritage management in 2015. Cultural heritage management is recommended to be carried out through a community participation process. Despite the growing literature on community participation in cultural heritage management, little research has been done on comparing Chinese to international approaches. Although in China several pilot projects have conducted effective community participation and achieved excellent outcomes. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing an overview that compares and discusses the similarities and differences between Chinese and international approaches. A systematic literature review of the state-of-the-art was conducted to explore these differences based on four themes: engaged communities, participatory methods, degrees of participation and steps taken within cultural heritage management. This review concludes both Chinese and international practices seek to collaborate with and empower local communities in their approaches, with Chinese pilot cases, such as Tianzifang in Shanghai. However, in general, Chinese cultural heritage management is government-led, in which community participation is happening to a minimal degree. China is encouraged to learn from international practices when developing contextualised management approaches, to better face the challenges of rapid urbanisation.

KW - China

KW - Community participation

KW - Cultural heritage

KW - Literature review

KW - Management approach

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074425852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102476

DO - 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102476

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074425852

VL - 96

JO - Cities

JF - Cities

SN - 0264-2751

M1 - 102476

ER -