Abstract
Recent years have seen an increasing attention to social aspects of software engineering, including studies of emotions and sentiments experienced and expressed by the software developers. Most of these studies reuse existing sentiment analysis tools such as SentiStrength and NLTK. However, these tools have been trained on product reviews and movie reviews and, therefore, their results might not be applicable in the software engineering domain.
In this paper we study whether the sentiment analysis tools agree with the sentiment recognized by human evaluators (as reported in an earlier study) as well as with each other. Furthermore, we evaluate the impact of the choice of a sentiment analysis tool on software engineering studies by conducting a simple study of differences in issue resolution times for positive, negative and neutral texts. We repeat the study for seven datasets (issue trackers and STACK OVERFLOW questions) and different sentiment analysis tools and observe that the disagreement between the tools can lead to contradictory conclusions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 2015 IEEE 31st International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME) : September 29 - October 1, 2015, Bremen, Gemany |
Editors | R. Koschke, J. Krinke, M. Robillard |
Place of Publication | Piscataway |
Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers |
Pages | 531-535 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-4673-7532-0 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Event | 31st International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME 2015) - Bremen, Germany Duration: 29 Sept 2015 → 1 Oct 2015 Conference number: 31 http://www.icsme.uni-bremen.de/ |
Conference
Conference | 31st International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME 2015) |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | ICSME 2015 |
Country/Territory | Germany |
City | Bremen |
Period | 29/09/15 → 1/10/15 |
Internet address |