Changes in muscle fiber conduction velocity indicate recruitment of distinct motor unit populations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

To obtain more insight into the changes in mean muscle fiber conduction velocity (MFCV) during sustained isometric exercise at relatively low contraction levels, we performed an in-depth study of the human tibialis anterior muscle by using multichannel surface electromyogram. The results show an increase in MFCV after an initial decrease of MFCV at 30 or 40% maximum voluntary contraction in all of the five subjects studied. With a peak velocity analysis, we calculated the distribution of conduction velocities of action potentials in the bipolar electromyogram signal. It shows two populations of peak velocities occurring simultaneously halfway through the exercise. The MFCV pattern implies the recruitment of two different populations of motor units. Because of the lowering of MFCV of the first activated population of motor units, the newly recruited second population of motor units becomes visible. It is most likely that the MFCV pattern can be ascribed to the fatiguing of already recruited predominantly type I motor units, followed by the recruitment of fresh, predominantly type II, motor units.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1045-1054
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Applied Physiology
Volume95
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2003
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Action Potentials/physiology
  • Adult
  • Electromyography
  • Exercise/physiology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Motor Neurons/physiology
  • Muscle Contraction/physiology
  • Muscle Fatigue/physiology
  • Muscle Fibers, Fast-Twitch/physiology
  • Muscle Fibers, Skeletal/physiology
  • Muscle Fibers, Slow-Twitch/physiology
  • Muscle, Skeletal/cytology
  • Neural Conduction/physiology
  • Recruitment, Neurophysiological/physiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Changes in muscle fiber conduction velocity indicate recruitment of distinct motor unit populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this