Abstract
Sleep stage classification is an important tool for the diagnosis of sleep disorders. Because sleep staging has such a high impact on clinical outcome, it is important that it is done reliably. However, it is known that uncertainty exists in both expert scorers and automated models. On average, the agreement between human scorers is only 82.6%. In this study, we provide a theoretical framework to facilitate discussion and further analyses of uncertainty in sleep staging. To this end, we introduce two variants of uncertainty, known from statistics and the machine learning community: aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty. We discuss what these types of uncertainties are, why the distinction is useful, where they arise from in sleep staging, and provide recommendations on how this framework can improve sleep staging in the future.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | zsac134 |
Journal | Sleep |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 11 Aug 2022 |
Keywords
- Sleep staging
- Hypnogram
- Inter-rater agreement
- Machine Learning
- Uncertainty
- Aleatoric uncertainty
- Epistemic uncertainty
- Models, Theoretical
- Sleep Stages
- Humans
- Observer Variation
- epistemic
- hypnogram
- machine learning
- sleep staging
- uncertainty
- aleatoric
- inter-rater agreement
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Certainty about Uncertainty in Sleep Staging: a Theoretical Framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research areas
-
Sleep Medicine
van Gilst, M. M. (Content manager) & van der Hout-van der Jagt, M. B. (Content manager)
Impact: Research Topic/Theme (at group level)