Caste as community? Networks of social affinity in a South Indian village

S. Arora, B. Sanditov

Research output: Book/ReportReportAcademic

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We examine three theories of caste and community using new data on social networks among residents of a south Indian village. The first theory treats individual caste groups as separated communities driven by the Brahmanical ideology of hierarchy based on purity and pollution. The second theory departs from the first by placing kings and landlords at the centre of rural (primeval) social structure. Here ritual giving by kings provides the glue that holds a community together by transferring inauspiciousness to gift-recipients and ensuring community welfare. The third theory, that may be treated as a corollary of the second, argues that powerful leaders in the religious and political domains act as patrons of people in their constituencies and forge a sense of community. The resulting community may be single or multi-caste. Using a community structure algorithm from social network analysis, we divide the network of the village into thirteen tight-knit clusters. We find that no cluster or community in the social network has exactly the same boundaries as a caste group in the village. Barring three exceptions, all clusters are multi-caste. Our results are most consistent with the third theory: each cluster has a patron/leader who represents the interests of his constituency at village-level fora and bridges caste and community divides.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationMaastricht
PublisherUniversiteit Maastricht
Number of pages40
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Publication series

NameUNU-MERIT Working Papers
Volume2009-037

Fingerprint

caste
village
community
social network
leader
landlord
network analysis
gift
social structure
religious behavior
ideology
recipient
Group
welfare
resident

Cite this

Arora, S., & Sanditov, B. (2009). Caste as community? Networks of social affinity in a South Indian village. (UNU-MERIT Working Papers; Vol. 2009-037). Maastricht: Universiteit Maastricht.
Arora, S. ; Sanditov, B. / Caste as community? Networks of social affinity in a South Indian village. Maastricht : Universiteit Maastricht, 2009. 40 p. (UNU-MERIT Working Papers).
@book{5becea1267064701a15e6c89c684fc20,
title = "Caste as community? Networks of social affinity in a South Indian village",
abstract = "We examine three theories of caste and community using new data on social networks among residents of a south Indian village. The first theory treats individual caste groups as separated communities driven by the Brahmanical ideology of hierarchy based on purity and pollution. The second theory departs from the first by placing kings and landlords at the centre of rural (primeval) social structure. Here ritual giving by kings provides the glue that holds a community together by transferring inauspiciousness to gift-recipients and ensuring community welfare. The third theory, that may be treated as a corollary of the second, argues that powerful leaders in the religious and political domains act as patrons of people in their constituencies and forge a sense of community. The resulting community may be single or multi-caste. Using a community structure algorithm from social network analysis, we divide the network of the village into thirteen tight-knit clusters. We find that no cluster or community in the social network has exactly the same boundaries as a caste group in the village. Barring three exceptions, all clusters are multi-caste. Our results are most consistent with the third theory: each cluster has a patron/leader who represents the interests of his constituency at village-level fora and bridges caste and community divides.",
author = "S. Arora and B. Sanditov",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
series = "UNU-MERIT Working Papers",
publisher = "Universiteit Maastricht",

}

Arora, S & Sanditov, B 2009, Caste as community? Networks of social affinity in a South Indian village. UNU-MERIT Working Papers, vol. 2009-037, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht.

Caste as community? Networks of social affinity in a South Indian village. / Arora, S.; Sanditov, B.

Maastricht : Universiteit Maastricht, 2009. 40 p. (UNU-MERIT Working Papers; Vol. 2009-037).

Research output: Book/ReportReportAcademic

TY - BOOK

T1 - Caste as community? Networks of social affinity in a South Indian village

AU - Arora, S.

AU - Sanditov, B.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - We examine three theories of caste and community using new data on social networks among residents of a south Indian village. The first theory treats individual caste groups as separated communities driven by the Brahmanical ideology of hierarchy based on purity and pollution. The second theory departs from the first by placing kings and landlords at the centre of rural (primeval) social structure. Here ritual giving by kings provides the glue that holds a community together by transferring inauspiciousness to gift-recipients and ensuring community welfare. The third theory, that may be treated as a corollary of the second, argues that powerful leaders in the religious and political domains act as patrons of people in their constituencies and forge a sense of community. The resulting community may be single or multi-caste. Using a community structure algorithm from social network analysis, we divide the network of the village into thirteen tight-knit clusters. We find that no cluster or community in the social network has exactly the same boundaries as a caste group in the village. Barring three exceptions, all clusters are multi-caste. Our results are most consistent with the third theory: each cluster has a patron/leader who represents the interests of his constituency at village-level fora and bridges caste and community divides.

AB - We examine three theories of caste and community using new data on social networks among residents of a south Indian village. The first theory treats individual caste groups as separated communities driven by the Brahmanical ideology of hierarchy based on purity and pollution. The second theory departs from the first by placing kings and landlords at the centre of rural (primeval) social structure. Here ritual giving by kings provides the glue that holds a community together by transferring inauspiciousness to gift-recipients and ensuring community welfare. The third theory, that may be treated as a corollary of the second, argues that powerful leaders in the religious and political domains act as patrons of people in their constituencies and forge a sense of community. The resulting community may be single or multi-caste. Using a community structure algorithm from social network analysis, we divide the network of the village into thirteen tight-knit clusters. We find that no cluster or community in the social network has exactly the same boundaries as a caste group in the village. Barring three exceptions, all clusters are multi-caste. Our results are most consistent with the third theory: each cluster has a patron/leader who represents the interests of his constituency at village-level fora and bridges caste and community divides.

M3 - Report

T3 - UNU-MERIT Working Papers

BT - Caste as community? Networks of social affinity in a South Indian village

PB - Universiteit Maastricht

CY - Maastricht

ER -

Arora S, Sanditov B. Caste as community? Networks of social affinity in a South Indian village. Maastricht: Universiteit Maastricht, 2009. 40 p. (UNU-MERIT Working Papers).