Abstract
Computerized safety checklist systems designed for improving care-givers' situation awareness are emerging in recent years. These systems are proved to be effective for improving adherence to guidelines while keeping high user acceptance. However, most of these systems are still hard-coded since it is yet unclear to what extent can existing guideline modeling languages capture the requirements for such a type of systems. This paper answers this research question by carrying out three case studies using three distinct and representative type of guideline languages. The expressiveness, interoperability, and maintainability of these three languages are compared against the requirements of typical computerized safety checklists. The results indicate all of these languages can partially support the requirements of computerized safety checklists. Whereas some important features of computerized checklists are not yet covered these languages.
| Language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings - 2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2018 |
| Editors | Harald Schmidt, David Griol, Haiying Wang, Jan Baumbach, Huiru Zheng, Zoraida Callejas, Xiaohua Hu, Julie Dickerson, Le Zhang |
| Place of Publication | Piscataway |
| Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers |
| Pages | 1500-1503 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 978-1-5386-5488-0 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 21 Jan 2019 |
| Event | 2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2018 - Madrid, Spain Duration: 3 Dec 2018 → 6 Dec 2018 |
Conference
| Conference | 2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2018 |
|---|---|
| Country | Spain |
| City | Madrid |
| Period | 3/12/18 → 6/12/18 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Clinical Decision Support
- Clinical Guideline
- Guideline Definition Language
- Safety Checklist
Cite this
}
Can existing guideline languages meet the requirements of computerized checklist systems? / Lu, Leixing; Nan, Shan; Zhang, Sicui; Lu, Xudong; Duan, Huilong.
Proceedings - 2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2018. ed. / Harald Schmidt; David Griol; Haiying Wang; Jan Baumbach; Huiru Zheng; Zoraida Callejas; Xiaohua Hu; Julie Dickerson; Le Zhang. Piscataway : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2019. p. 1500-1503 8621299.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review
TY - GEN
T1 - Can existing guideline languages meet the requirements of computerized checklist systems?
AU - Lu,Leixing
AU - Nan,Shan
AU - Zhang,Sicui
AU - Lu,Xudong
AU - Duan,Huilong
PY - 2019/1/21
Y1 - 2019/1/21
N2 - Computerized safety checklist systems designed for improving care-givers' situation awareness are emerging in recent years. These systems are proved to be effective for improving adherence to guidelines while keeping high user acceptance. However, most of these systems are still hard-coded since it is yet unclear to what extent can existing guideline modeling languages capture the requirements for such a type of systems. This paper answers this research question by carrying out three case studies using three distinct and representative type of guideline languages. The expressiveness, interoperability, and maintainability of these three languages are compared against the requirements of typical computerized safety checklists. The results indicate all of these languages can partially support the requirements of computerized safety checklists. Whereas some important features of computerized checklists are not yet covered these languages.
AB - Computerized safety checklist systems designed for improving care-givers' situation awareness are emerging in recent years. These systems are proved to be effective for improving adherence to guidelines while keeping high user acceptance. However, most of these systems are still hard-coded since it is yet unclear to what extent can existing guideline modeling languages capture the requirements for such a type of systems. This paper answers this research question by carrying out three case studies using three distinct and representative type of guideline languages. The expressiveness, interoperability, and maintainability of these three languages are compared against the requirements of typical computerized safety checklists. The results indicate all of these languages can partially support the requirements of computerized safety checklists. Whereas some important features of computerized checklists are not yet covered these languages.
KW - Clinical Decision Support
KW - Clinical Guideline
KW - Guideline Definition Language
KW - Safety Checklist
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062551688&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/BIBM.2018.8621299
DO - 10.1109/BIBM.2018.8621299
M3 - Conference contribution
SP - 1500
EP - 1503
BT - Proceedings - 2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2018
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
CY - Piscataway
ER -