Bridging the gap: the case for an ‘Incompletely Theorized Agreement’ on AI policy

Charlotte Stix, Matthijs M. Maas (Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Recent progress in artificial intelligence (AI) raises a wide array of ethical and societal concerns. Accordingly, an appropriate policy approach is urgently needed. While there has been a wave of scholarship in this field, the research community at times appears divided amongst those who emphasize ‘near-term’ concerns and those focusing on ‘long-term’ concerns and corresponding policy measures. In this paper, we seek to examine this alleged ‘gap’, with a view to understanding the practical space for inter-community collaboration on AI policy. We propose to make use of the principle of an ‘incompletely theorized agreement’ to bridge some underlying disagreements, in the name of important cooperation on addressing AI’s urgent challenges. We propose that on certain issue areas, scholars working with near-term and long-term perspectives can converge and cooperate on selected mutually beneficial AI policy projects, while maintaining their distinct perspectives.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAI and Ethics
VolumeXX
Issue numberXX
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Jan 2021

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence (AI)
  • Policy making
  • governance of science and technology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Bridging the gap: the case for an ‘Incompletely Theorized Agreement’ on AI policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this