BitTorrent's dilemma: Enhancing reciprocity or reducing inequity

A.L. Jia, L. D'Acunto, M. Meulpolder, J.A. Pouwelse, D.H.J. Epema

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)
    64 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Enhancing reciprocity has been one of the primary motivations for the design of incentive policies in BitTorrent-like P2P systems. Reciprocity implies that peers need to contribute their bandwidth to other peers if they want to receive bandwidth in return. However, the over-provisioning that characterizes today's BitTorrent communities and the development of many next-generation P2P systems with real-time constraints (e.g., for live and on-demand streaming) suggest that more effort can be devoted to reducing the inequity (i.e., the difference of service received) among peers, rather than only enhancing reciprocity. Inspired by this observation, in this work we analyze in detail several incentive mechanisms that are used in BitTorrent systems, and explore several strategies that influence the balance between reciprocity and equity. Our study shows that (i) reducing inequity leads to a better overall system performance, and (ii) the behavior of seeders (i.e., peers that hold a complete copy of the file and upload it for free) influences whether reciprocity is enhanced or inequity reduced.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings 8th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC'2011, Las Vegas NV, USA, January 9-12, 2011)
    PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
    Pages705-709
    ISBN (Print)978-1-4244-8789-9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Bandwidth

    Cite this

    Jia, A. L., D'Acunto, L., Meulpolder, M., Pouwelse, J. A., & Epema, D. H. J. (2011). BitTorrent's dilemma: Enhancing reciprocity or reducing inequity. In Proceedings 8th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC'2011, Las Vegas NV, USA, January 9-12, 2011) (pp. 705-709). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCNC.2011.5766581
    Jia, A.L. ; D'Acunto, L. ; Meulpolder, M. ; Pouwelse, J.A. ; Epema, D.H.J. / BitTorrent's dilemma: Enhancing reciprocity or reducing inequity. Proceedings 8th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC'2011, Las Vegas NV, USA, January 9-12, 2011). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2011. pp. 705-709
    @inproceedings{e2c2cbec67f3450f908f6018cd3278d0,
    title = "BitTorrent's dilemma: Enhancing reciprocity or reducing inequity",
    abstract = "Enhancing reciprocity has been one of the primary motivations for the design of incentive policies in BitTorrent-like P2P systems. Reciprocity implies that peers need to contribute their bandwidth to other peers if they want to receive bandwidth in return. However, the over-provisioning that characterizes today's BitTorrent communities and the development of many next-generation P2P systems with real-time constraints (e.g., for live and on-demand streaming) suggest that more effort can be devoted to reducing the inequity (i.e., the difference of service received) among peers, rather than only enhancing reciprocity. Inspired by this observation, in this work we analyze in detail several incentive mechanisms that are used in BitTorrent systems, and explore several strategies that influence the balance between reciprocity and equity. Our study shows that (i) reducing inequity leads to a better overall system performance, and (ii) the behavior of seeders (i.e., peers that hold a complete copy of the file and upload it for free) influences whether reciprocity is enhanced or inequity reduced.",
    author = "A.L. Jia and L. D'Acunto and M. Meulpolder and J.A. Pouwelse and D.H.J. Epema",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1109/CCNC.2011.5766581",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978-1-4244-8789-9",
    pages = "705--709",
    booktitle = "Proceedings 8th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC'2011, Las Vegas NV, USA, January 9-12, 2011)",
    publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers",
    address = "United States",

    }

    Jia, AL, D'Acunto, L, Meulpolder, M, Pouwelse, JA & Epema, DHJ 2011, BitTorrent's dilemma: Enhancing reciprocity or reducing inequity. in Proceedings 8th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC'2011, Las Vegas NV, USA, January 9-12, 2011). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, pp. 705-709. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCNC.2011.5766581

    BitTorrent's dilemma: Enhancing reciprocity or reducing inequity. / Jia, A.L.; D'Acunto, L.; Meulpolder, M.; Pouwelse, J.A.; Epema, D.H.J.

    Proceedings 8th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC'2011, Las Vegas NV, USA, January 9-12, 2011). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2011. p. 705-709.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

    TY - GEN

    T1 - BitTorrent's dilemma: Enhancing reciprocity or reducing inequity

    AU - Jia, A.L.

    AU - D'Acunto, L.

    AU - Meulpolder, M.

    AU - Pouwelse, J.A.

    AU - Epema, D.H.J.

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - Enhancing reciprocity has been one of the primary motivations for the design of incentive policies in BitTorrent-like P2P systems. Reciprocity implies that peers need to contribute their bandwidth to other peers if they want to receive bandwidth in return. However, the over-provisioning that characterizes today's BitTorrent communities and the development of many next-generation P2P systems with real-time constraints (e.g., for live and on-demand streaming) suggest that more effort can be devoted to reducing the inequity (i.e., the difference of service received) among peers, rather than only enhancing reciprocity. Inspired by this observation, in this work we analyze in detail several incentive mechanisms that are used in BitTorrent systems, and explore several strategies that influence the balance between reciprocity and equity. Our study shows that (i) reducing inequity leads to a better overall system performance, and (ii) the behavior of seeders (i.e., peers that hold a complete copy of the file and upload it for free) influences whether reciprocity is enhanced or inequity reduced.

    AB - Enhancing reciprocity has been one of the primary motivations for the design of incentive policies in BitTorrent-like P2P systems. Reciprocity implies that peers need to contribute their bandwidth to other peers if they want to receive bandwidth in return. However, the over-provisioning that characterizes today's BitTorrent communities and the development of many next-generation P2P systems with real-time constraints (e.g., for live and on-demand streaming) suggest that more effort can be devoted to reducing the inequity (i.e., the difference of service received) among peers, rather than only enhancing reciprocity. Inspired by this observation, in this work we analyze in detail several incentive mechanisms that are used in BitTorrent systems, and explore several strategies that influence the balance between reciprocity and equity. Our study shows that (i) reducing inequity leads to a better overall system performance, and (ii) the behavior of seeders (i.e., peers that hold a complete copy of the file and upload it for free) influences whether reciprocity is enhanced or inequity reduced.

    U2 - 10.1109/CCNC.2011.5766581

    DO - 10.1109/CCNC.2011.5766581

    M3 - Conference contribution

    SN - 978-1-4244-8789-9

    SP - 705

    EP - 709

    BT - Proceedings 8th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC'2011, Las Vegas NV, USA, January 9-12, 2011)

    PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers

    ER -

    Jia AL, D'Acunto L, Meulpolder M, Pouwelse JA, Epema DHJ. BitTorrent's dilemma: Enhancing reciprocity or reducing inequity. In Proceedings 8th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC'2011, Las Vegas NV, USA, January 9-12, 2011). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. 2011. p. 705-709 https://doi.org/10.1109/CCNC.2011.5766581