Bifurcation analysis versus maximum force criteria in formability limit assessment of stretched metal sheets

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
109 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The present contribution deals with the prediction of diffuse necking in the context of forming and stretching of metal sheets. For this purpose, two approaches are investigated, namely bifurcation and the maximum force principle, with a systematic comparison of their respective ability to predict necking. While the bifurcation approach is of quite general applicability, some restrictions are shown for the application of maximum force conditions. Although the predictions of the two approaches are identical for particular loading paths and constitutive models, they are generally different, which is even the case for elasticity, confirming the distinct nature of the two concepts. Closed-form expressions of the critical stress and strain states are derived for both criteria in elasto-plasticity and rigid-plasticity for a variety of hardening models. The resulting useful formulas in rigid-plasticity are shown to also accurately represent the elasto-plastic critical states for small ratios of the hardening modulus with respect to Young's modulus. Finally, the well-known expression of Swift's diffuse necking criterion, whose foundations are attributed in the literature to the maximum force principle, is shown here to originate from the bifurcation approach instead, providing a sound justification for it.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1450064
Pages (from-to)1450064-1/27
Number of pages27
JournalInternational Journal of Applied Mechanics
Volume6
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bifurcation analysis versus maximum force criteria in formability limit assessment of stretched metal sheets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this