Abstract
When designing technologies for children, designers and researchers often implicitly or explicitly incorporate an interpretation of what a child is, how children learn, or how they play etc. in their design process. However, if these assumptions are not communicated explicitly, discussions among researchers and designers can become difficult because they are not based on the same premises. It is important for the IDC community to be explicit about what assumptions are being made about children and how technology can support their life, so we can develop better quality argumentations about our work.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) |
| Editors | J.C. Read, P. Stenton |
| Place of Publication | New York |
| Publisher | Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. |
| Pages | 713-719 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-1-4503-4313-8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
| Event | 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC 2016 - Manchester, United Kingdom Duration: 21 Jun 2016 → 24 Jun 2016 Conference number: 15 http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2930674.2932224 |
Conference
| Conference | 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC 2016 |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | IDC 2016 |
| Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
| City | Manchester |
| Period | 21/06/16 → 24/06/16 |
| Internet address |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Being explicit about underlying values, assumptions and views when designing for children in the IDC community'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver