Bearing strength capacity of continuous supported timber beams : unified approach for test methods and structural design codes

A.J.M. Leijten, F. Franke, P. Quenneville, R. Gupta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Bearing or compressive-strength capacity perpendicular to the grain of timber beams is a troublesome issue. Not only do many different load cases occur in practice that are not covered by structural timber design codes, but also these codes provide only a basic provision and vary throughout continents. Code design rules require the standardized compressive or bearing strength to be determined by test standards. An assessment of the results of standard test methods of the European Union, North America, and Australia/New Zealand shows incompatibility. It is demonstrated how previously incompatible results can be made compatible by using a physical model and some calibration tests. The proposed model offers a consistent and simple way to bridge the differences between both test standards and structural design codes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)266-272
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Structural Engineering
Volume138
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Bearings (structural)
Timber
Structural design
Compressive strength
Calibration

Cite this

@article{5125ec4e71b2423290441c4fad1f9b1c,
title = "Bearing strength capacity of continuous supported timber beams : unified approach for test methods and structural design codes",
abstract = "Bearing or compressive-strength capacity perpendicular to the grain of timber beams is a troublesome issue. Not only do many different load cases occur in practice that are not covered by structural timber design codes, but also these codes provide only a basic provision and vary throughout continents. Code design rules require the standardized compressive or bearing strength to be determined by test standards. An assessment of the results of standard test methods of the European Union, North America, and Australia/New Zealand shows incompatibility. It is demonstrated how previously incompatible results can be made compatible by using a physical model and some calibration tests. The proposed model offers a consistent and simple way to bridge the differences between both test standards and structural design codes.",
author = "A.J.M. Leijten and F. Franke and P. Quenneville and R. Gupta",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000454",
language = "English",
volume = "138",
pages = "266--272",
journal = "Journal of Structural Engineering",
issn = "0733-9445",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "2",

}

Bearing strength capacity of continuous supported timber beams : unified approach for test methods and structural design codes. / Leijten, A.J.M.; Franke, F.; Quenneville, P.; Gupta, R.

In: Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 138, No. 2, 2012, p. 266-272.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bearing strength capacity of continuous supported timber beams : unified approach for test methods and structural design codes

AU - Leijten, A.J.M.

AU - Franke, F.

AU - Quenneville, P.

AU - Gupta, R.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Bearing or compressive-strength capacity perpendicular to the grain of timber beams is a troublesome issue. Not only do many different load cases occur in practice that are not covered by structural timber design codes, but also these codes provide only a basic provision and vary throughout continents. Code design rules require the standardized compressive or bearing strength to be determined by test standards. An assessment of the results of standard test methods of the European Union, North America, and Australia/New Zealand shows incompatibility. It is demonstrated how previously incompatible results can be made compatible by using a physical model and some calibration tests. The proposed model offers a consistent and simple way to bridge the differences between both test standards and structural design codes.

AB - Bearing or compressive-strength capacity perpendicular to the grain of timber beams is a troublesome issue. Not only do many different load cases occur in practice that are not covered by structural timber design codes, but also these codes provide only a basic provision and vary throughout continents. Code design rules require the standardized compressive or bearing strength to be determined by test standards. An assessment of the results of standard test methods of the European Union, North America, and Australia/New Zealand shows incompatibility. It is demonstrated how previously incompatible results can be made compatible by using a physical model and some calibration tests. The proposed model offers a consistent and simple way to bridge the differences between both test standards and structural design codes.

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000454

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000454

M3 - Article

VL - 138

SP - 266

EP - 272

JO - Journal of Structural Engineering

JF - Journal of Structural Engineering

SN - 0733-9445

IS - 2

ER -