Ball-on-ring test revisited

G. With, de, H.H.M. Wagemans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

104 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A literature survey indicates that the ball-on-ring test is the best biaxial strength testing method. There is, however, some controversy in the calculation of the strength. In this communication, the theroretical controversy of the ball-on-ring test is resolved by strain and deflection analysis. Consequently, the ball-on-ring test can be used as a reliable method for testing the strength of flat brittle specimens.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1538-1541
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the American Ceramic Society
Volume72
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1989

Fingerprint

Testing
testing method
deflection
Communication
communication
test
method
analysis
calculation

Cite this

With, de, G. ; Wagemans, H.H.M. / Ball-on-ring test revisited. In: Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 1989 ; Vol. 72, No. 8. pp. 1538-1541.
@article{9e9d07f129b5457c8f6817eb634c6386,
title = "Ball-on-ring test revisited",
abstract = "A literature survey indicates that the ball-on-ring test is the best biaxial strength testing method. There is, however, some controversy in the calculation of the strength. In this communication, the theroretical controversy of the ball-on-ring test is resolved by strain and deflection analysis. Consequently, the ball-on-ring test can be used as a reliable method for testing the strength of flat brittle specimens.",
author = "{With, de}, G. and H.H.M. Wagemans",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb07702.x",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "1538--1541",
journal = "Journal of the American Ceramic Society",
issn = "0002-7820",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

Ball-on-ring test revisited. / With, de, G.; Wagemans, H.H.M.

In: Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol. 72, No. 8, 1989, p. 1538-1541.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ball-on-ring test revisited

AU - With, de, G.

AU - Wagemans, H.H.M.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - A literature survey indicates that the ball-on-ring test is the best biaxial strength testing method. There is, however, some controversy in the calculation of the strength. In this communication, the theroretical controversy of the ball-on-ring test is resolved by strain and deflection analysis. Consequently, the ball-on-ring test can be used as a reliable method for testing the strength of flat brittle specimens.

AB - A literature survey indicates that the ball-on-ring test is the best biaxial strength testing method. There is, however, some controversy in the calculation of the strength. In this communication, the theroretical controversy of the ball-on-ring test is resolved by strain and deflection analysis. Consequently, the ball-on-ring test can be used as a reliable method for testing the strength of flat brittle specimens.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb07702.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb07702.x

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 1538

EP - 1541

JO - Journal of the American Ceramic Society

JF - Journal of the American Ceramic Society

SN - 0002-7820

IS - 8

ER -