Abstract
Despite an increasing number of examples of shape- changing interfaces, the relation between users’ actions and product movements has not gained a great deal of attention, nor been very well articulated. This paper presents a framework articulating the level of control offered to the user over the shape change. The framework considers whether the shape change is: 1) directly controlled by the user’s explicit interactions; 2) negotiated with the user; 3) indirectly controlled by the users actions; 4) fully controlled by the system. The four types are described through design examples using ReFlex, a shape-changing interface in the form of a smartphone. The paper concludes that shape-changing interfaces tend to assign the control to either the user or the underlying system, while few (e.g. [16,28]) consider sharing the control between the user and the system.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceeding TEI '16 Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction |
Subtitle of host publication | ACM |
Place of Publication | New York |
Pages | 202-210 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 14 Feb 2016 |
Event | 10th Anniversary Conference on Tangible Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI 2016) - Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands Duration: 14 Feb 2016 → 17 Feb 2016 Conference number: 10 http://www.tei-conf.org/16/ https://tei.acm.org/2016/ http://www.tei-conf.org/16/ |
Conference
Conference | 10th Anniversary Conference on Tangible Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI 2016) |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | TEI 2016 |
Country/Territory | Netherlands |
City | Eindhoven |
Period | 14/02/16 → 17/02/16 |
Internet address |