Abstract
Abstract
We study m-sequencing games, which were introduced by [Hamers, H., Klijn, F., Suijs, J., (1999). On the balancedness of multiple machine sequencing games. European Journal of Operational Research 119, 678–691]. We answer the open question whether all these games are balanced in the negative. We do so, by an example of a 3-sequencing situation with 5 jobs, whose associated 3-sequencing game has an empty core. The counterexample finds its basis in an inconsistency in [Hamers et al., ibid], which was probably overlooked by the authors. This observation demands for a detailed reconsideration of their proofs.1
Keywords: Game theory; Cooperative games; Sequencing situations
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1944-1949 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | European Journal of Operational Research |
| Volume | 174 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2006 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Balancedness of multiple machine sequencing games revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver