Assessing usability evaluation methods on their effectiveness to elicit verbal comments from children subjects

Ilse E.H. van Kesteren, Mathilde M. Bekker, Arnold P.O.S. Vermeeren, Peter A. Lloyd

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

    59 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    An exploratory study is described looking at children's ability to provide verbal comments in usability evaluation sessions. Six evaluation methods were applied to test an interactive toy by children aged 6 and 7. The results show that most verbal comments were gathered during Active Intervention sessions, by asking children questions during tasks. Unexpectedly, the Co-Discovery sessions were less successful, because children did not collaborate very well. Children also provided useful comments in the Thinking Aloud, Retrospection, and Peer Tutoring sessions. They could reflect on their actions at the end of Retrospection sessions, and were able to teach other children how to interact with the toy in Peer Tutoring sessions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationIDC '03
    Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of the 2003 conference on Interaction design and children
    EditorsStuart MacFarlane, Tony Nicol, Janet Read, Linda Snape
    PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery, Inc.
    Pages41-49
    Number of pages9
    ISBN (Electronic)978-1-58113-732-3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2003
    Event2003 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC 2003 - Preston, United Kingdom
    Duration: 1 Jul 20033 Jul 2003

    Conference

    Conference2003 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC 2003
    Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
    CityPreston
    Period1/07/033/07/03

    Keywords

    • Children
    • Empirical usability evaluation methods
    • Toys
    • Verbal comments

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing usability evaluation methods on their effectiveness to elicit verbal comments from children subjects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this