Artificial Intelligence-Based Arterial Input Function for the Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Blood Flow and Perfusion Reserve in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: A Validation Study

  • CRUCIAL Investigators
  • , Lara R. van der Meulen
  • , Maud van Dinther
  • , Amedeo Chiribiri
  • , Jouke Smink
  • , Walter H. Backes
  • , Jonathan Bennett
  • , Joachim E. Wildberger
  • , Cian M. Scannell
  • , Robert J. Holtackers (Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To validate an artificial intelligence-based arterial input function (AI-AIF) deep learning model for myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification during stress perfusion and assess its extension to rest perfusion, enabling myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) calculation. Methods: Sixty patients with or at risk for vascular cognitive impairment, prospectively enrolled in the CRUCIAL consortium, underwent quantitative stress and rest myocardial perfusion imaging using a 3 T MRI system. Perfusion imaging was performed using a dual-sequence (DS) protocol after intravenous administration of 0.05 mmol/kg gadobutrol. Retrospectively, the AI-AIF was estimated from standard perfusion images using a 1-D U-Net model trained to predict an unsaturated AIF from a saturated input. MBF was quantified using Fermi function-constrained deconvolution with motion compensation. MPR was calculated as the stress-to-rest MBF ratio. MBF and MPR estimates from both AIF methods were compared using Bland–Altman analyses. Results: Complete stress and rest perfusion datasets were available for 31 patients. A bias of −0.07 mL/g/min was observed between AI-AIF and DS-AIF for stress MBF (median 2.19 vs. 2.30 mL/g/min), with concordant coronary artery disease classification based on the optimal MBF threshold in over 92% of myocardial segments and coronary arteries. Larger biases of 0.12 mL/g/min and −0.30 were observed for rest MBF (1.12 vs. 1.02 mL/g/min) and MPR (2.31 vs. 1.84), respectively, with lower concordance using the optimal MPR threshold (85% of segments, 72% of arteries). Conclusions: The AI-AIF model showed comparable performance to DS-AIF for stress MBF quantification but requires further training for accurate rest MBF and MPR assessment.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2341
JournalDiagnostics
Volume15
Issue number18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.

Keywords

  • arterial input function
  • artificial intelligence
  • cardiac magnetic resonance
  • myocardial blood flow
  • myocardial perfusion reserve
  • quantitative myocardial perfusion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Artificial Intelligence-Based Arterial Input Function for the Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Blood Flow and Perfusion Reserve in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: A Validation Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this