An exploratory study into teachers’ beliefs and experiences about allocating students

J.P.W. Sleenhof; M. Koopman; M.C.G. Thurlings; D. Beijaard

doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.01.007

An exploratory study into teachers’ beliefs and experiences about allocating students

J.P.W. Sleenhof (Corresponding author), M. Koopman, M.C.G. Thurlings, D. Beijaard

ESoE

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study explores teachers’ beliefs and experiences regarding the decisions they make about students during so-called allocation meetings, including the role of a number of influencing factors. Semi-structured interviews were held with 22 teachers from four schools. Teachers’ perceptions indicate that allocation decisions are often unstructured and variable due to differences within and between schools in group processes, in decision-making and in argumentation used to substantiate teacher expectations. This variety raises doubts about the fairness and quality of allocation decisions. Professional development is suggested to improve these decisions, with a focus on group processes and individual teacher expectations.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	94-105
Number of pages	12
Journal	Teaching and Teacher Education
Volume	80
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.01.007
Publication status	Published - 1 Apr 2019

Keywords

Allocation decisions
Decision-making
Group processes
Secondary education
Teacher expectations

Access to Document

10.1016/j.tate.2019.01.007

Link to publication in Scopus

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'An exploratory study into teachers’ beliefs and experiences about allocating students'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{b27d67b8f53f4f7c9d05d7f9297027fa,

title = "An exploratory study into teachers{\textquoteright} beliefs and experiences about allocating students",

abstract = "This study explores teachers{\textquoteright} beliefs and experiences regarding the decisions they make about students during so-called allocation meetings, including the role of a number of influencing factors. Semi-structured interviews were held with 22 teachers from four schools. Teachers{\textquoteright} perceptions indicate that allocation decisions are often unstructured and variable due to differences within and between schools in group processes, in decision-making and in argumentation used to substantiate teacher expectations. This variety raises doubts about the fairness and quality of allocation decisions. Professional development is suggested to improve these decisions, with a focus on group processes and individual teacher expectations.",

keywords = "Allocation decisions, Decision-making, Group processes, Secondary education, Teacher expectations",

author = "J.P.W. Sleenhof and M. Koopman and M.C.G. Thurlings and D. Beijaard",

year = "2019",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.tate.2019.01.007",

language = "English",

volume = "80",

pages = "94--105",

journal = "Teaching and Teacher Education",

issn = "0742-051X",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An exploratory study into teachers’ beliefs and experiences about allocating students

AU - Sleenhof, J.P.W.

AU - Koopman, M.

AU - Thurlings, M.C.G.

AU - Beijaard, D.

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - This study explores teachers’ beliefs and experiences regarding the decisions they make about students during so-called allocation meetings, including the role of a number of influencing factors. Semi-structured interviews were held with 22 teachers from four schools. Teachers’ perceptions indicate that allocation decisions are often unstructured and variable due to differences within and between schools in group processes, in decision-making and in argumentation used to substantiate teacher expectations. This variety raises doubts about the fairness and quality of allocation decisions. Professional development is suggested to improve these decisions, with a focus on group processes and individual teacher expectations.

AB - This study explores teachers’ beliefs and experiences regarding the decisions they make about students during so-called allocation meetings, including the role of a number of influencing factors. Semi-structured interviews were held with 22 teachers from four schools. Teachers’ perceptions indicate that allocation decisions are often unstructured and variable due to differences within and between schools in group processes, in decision-making and in argumentation used to substantiate teacher expectations. This variety raises doubts about the fairness and quality of allocation decisions. Professional development is suggested to improve these decisions, with a focus on group processes and individual teacher expectations.

KW - Allocation decisions

KW - Decision-making

KW - Group processes

KW - Secondary education

KW - Teacher expectations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060220147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tate.2019.01.007

DO - 10.1016/j.tate.2019.01.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85060220147

VL - 80

SP - 94

EP - 105

JO - Teaching and Teacher Education

JF - Teaching and Teacher Education

SN - 0742-051X

ER -