An empirical validation of four different measures to quantify user interface characteristics based on a general descriptive concept for interaction points

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)
    53 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The main problem of standards (e.g. ISO 9241) in the context of usability of software quality is that they cannot measure all relevant product features in a task independent way. We present a new approach to measure user interface quality in a quantitative way. First, we developed a concept to describe user interfaces on a granularity level, that is detailed enough to presence important interface characteristics, and is general enough to cover most of known interface types. We distinguish between different types of "interaction points". With these kinds of interaction points we can describe several types of interfaces (CUI: command, menu, form-fill-in; GUI: desktop, direct manipulation, multimedia, etc.). We carried out two different comparative usability studies to validate our quantitative measures. The results of one other published comparative usability study can be predicted. Results of six different interfaces are presented and discussed. One of the most important result is that the dialog flexibility must exceed a threshold of 15-measured with two of our metrics-to increase significantly the usability
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings IEEE Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer Based Systems, March 11-15, 1996, Friedrichshafen, Germany
    Place of PublicationLos Alamitos, CA
    PublisherIEEE Computer Society
    Pages435-441
    ISBN (Print)0818673559
    Publication statusPublished - 1996

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'An empirical validation of four different measures to quantify user interface characteristics based on a general descriptive concept for interaction points'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this