Accounting for cognitive effort in random regret-only models: effect of attribute variation and choice set size

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Behaviorally, regret-based choice models implicitly assume that individuals anticipate the amount of attribute-level regret by comparing the attribute levels of a considered choice alternative against the attribute levels of the best or all other choice alternatives. Arguing that the amount of effort depends on attribute variation and number of paired comparisons, we suggest a way of incorporating the effects of these factors into two regret-based choice models. The cognitive effort involved in anticipating the amount of regret in paired comparisons of choice alternatives is incorporated into the scale of the regret function of each alternative. Because more cognitive effort causes higher randomness in the assessment of the amount of regret (i.e. higher variance of error terms), the cognitive effort is expressed as a flexible heteroscedastic scale factor, which is a decreasing function of attribute variation and number of paired comparisons. The models are applied to two different data sets, and compared with a heteroscedastic multinomial logit model. Estimation results of the suggested flexible heteroscedastic random regret models show a significant improvement in predictive performance over their homoscedastic formulations. A similar but smaller improvement is obtained for multinomial logit models. These results imply that the conventional assumption of identically distributed error terms underlying random regret models may not sufficiently reflect the process of anticipating the amount of regret.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)842-863
Number of pages22
JournalEnvironment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science
Volume45
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

effect
attribute
cause
performance
comparison

Keywords

  • attribute variation
  • cognitive effort
  • number of attribute-level regrets
  • paired comparison
  • Regret-based choice models

Cite this

@article{58b95d1559974049bd22f5d8656d1e0f,
title = "Accounting for cognitive effort in random regret-only models: effect of attribute variation and choice set size",
abstract = "Behaviorally, regret-based choice models implicitly assume that individuals anticipate the amount of attribute-level regret by comparing the attribute levels of a considered choice alternative against the attribute levels of the best or all other choice alternatives. Arguing that the amount of effort depends on attribute variation and number of paired comparisons, we suggest a way of incorporating the effects of these factors into two regret-based choice models. The cognitive effort involved in anticipating the amount of regret in paired comparisons of choice alternatives is incorporated into the scale of the regret function of each alternative. Because more cognitive effort causes higher randomness in the assessment of the amount of regret (i.e. higher variance of error terms), the cognitive effort is expressed as a flexible heteroscedastic scale factor, which is a decreasing function of attribute variation and number of paired comparisons. The models are applied to two different data sets, and compared with a heteroscedastic multinomial logit model. Estimation results of the suggested flexible heteroscedastic random regret models show a significant improvement in predictive performance over their homoscedastic formulations. A similar but smaller improvement is obtained for multinomial logit models. These results imply that the conventional assumption of identically distributed error terms underlying random regret models may not sufficiently reflect the process of anticipating the amount of regret.",
keywords = "attribute variation, cognitive effort, number of attribute-level regrets, paired comparison, Regret-based choice models",
author = "Sunghoon Jang and Soora Rasouli and Harry Timmermans",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0265813516688687",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "842--863",
journal = "Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science",
issn = "2399-8083",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accounting for cognitive effort in random regret-only models

T2 - effect of attribute variation and choice set size

AU - Jang, Sunghoon

AU - Rasouli, Soora

AU - Timmermans, Harry

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Behaviorally, regret-based choice models implicitly assume that individuals anticipate the amount of attribute-level regret by comparing the attribute levels of a considered choice alternative against the attribute levels of the best or all other choice alternatives. Arguing that the amount of effort depends on attribute variation and number of paired comparisons, we suggest a way of incorporating the effects of these factors into two regret-based choice models. The cognitive effort involved in anticipating the amount of regret in paired comparisons of choice alternatives is incorporated into the scale of the regret function of each alternative. Because more cognitive effort causes higher randomness in the assessment of the amount of regret (i.e. higher variance of error terms), the cognitive effort is expressed as a flexible heteroscedastic scale factor, which is a decreasing function of attribute variation and number of paired comparisons. The models are applied to two different data sets, and compared with a heteroscedastic multinomial logit model. Estimation results of the suggested flexible heteroscedastic random regret models show a significant improvement in predictive performance over their homoscedastic formulations. A similar but smaller improvement is obtained for multinomial logit models. These results imply that the conventional assumption of identically distributed error terms underlying random regret models may not sufficiently reflect the process of anticipating the amount of regret.

AB - Behaviorally, regret-based choice models implicitly assume that individuals anticipate the amount of attribute-level regret by comparing the attribute levels of a considered choice alternative against the attribute levels of the best or all other choice alternatives. Arguing that the amount of effort depends on attribute variation and number of paired comparisons, we suggest a way of incorporating the effects of these factors into two regret-based choice models. The cognitive effort involved in anticipating the amount of regret in paired comparisons of choice alternatives is incorporated into the scale of the regret function of each alternative. Because more cognitive effort causes higher randomness in the assessment of the amount of regret (i.e. higher variance of error terms), the cognitive effort is expressed as a flexible heteroscedastic scale factor, which is a decreasing function of attribute variation and number of paired comparisons. The models are applied to two different data sets, and compared with a heteroscedastic multinomial logit model. Estimation results of the suggested flexible heteroscedastic random regret models show a significant improvement in predictive performance over their homoscedastic formulations. A similar but smaller improvement is obtained for multinomial logit models. These results imply that the conventional assumption of identically distributed error terms underlying random regret models may not sufficiently reflect the process of anticipating the amount of regret.

KW - attribute variation

KW - cognitive effort

KW - number of attribute-level regrets

KW - paired comparison

KW - Regret-based choice models

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027363725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0265813516688687

DO - 10.1177/0265813516688687

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85027363725

VL - 45

SP - 842

EP - 863

JO - Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science

JF - Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science

SN - 2399-8083

IS - 5

ER -