Abstract
To better understand why continuous improvement (CI) initiatives often fail and do not result in sustained changes, this paper investigates how management’s conceptualization of a continuous improvement program affects its implementation via middle managers. The study serves to identify the differences in outcomes of CI initiatives arising from implementing CI as an integral management versus an efficiency-improvement approach. This research draws on a vignette study (i.e. scenario experiment) with 107 middle managers working at one of the largest financial institutions in the Netherlands. The findings arising from this study suggest that CI is more likely to be adopted into the organizational culture, enhance the customer orientation among employees and improve the work atmosphere, when it is implemented as an integral management approach rather than as an efficiency-oriented program.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 100-115 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | International Journal of Business and Social Science |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2019 |
Keywords
- Continuous improvement
- Top management
- Middle manager
- Vignette study
- Experiment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A vignette study of middle managers’ responses to continuous improvement initiatives by top management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Press/Media
-
Succesvol de organisatie veranderen? Dan moet ook de top meedoen
25/10/19
1 Media contribution
Press/Media: Research
-
De twee belangrijkste mythes die de professionalisering van management blokkeren
21/10/19
1 Media contribution
Press/Media: Research
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver