A study of decoupling capacitor effectiveness in power and ground grid networks

Aida Todri, Malgorzata Marek-Sadowska, Francois Maire, Christophe Matheron

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Decaps can be very effective in reducing power grid noise, but they cannot be inserted on a chip in an ad-hoc manner without considering the grid parasitic impedances, switching frequencies of the blocks, and proximity to the power supply pins. It is possible that a decoupling capacitor inserted into a vacant space left by a placer may not only be inefficient, but can also be detrimental. In this paper, we present a detailed study of the decoupling capacitor's effectiveness in the uniform RLC power and ground grid networks. Based on the analysis of a simple circuit in which the decoupling capacitor amplifies the power grid noise, we explain why a decap can be detrimental. We introduce effectiveness metrics for determining those decoupling capacitor locations that capture the effects of parasitic impedances between the decap and switching circuit, decap and power supply, and switching frequency and magnitude of the switching circuit. Our experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed metrics.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2009 10th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Pages653-658
Number of pages6
ISBN (Print)978-1-4244-2952-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes
Event10th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design 2009 - San Jose, United States
Duration: 16 Mar 200918 Mar 2009

Conference

Conference10th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design 2009
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySan Jose
Period16/03/0918/03/09

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A study of decoupling capacitor effectiveness in power and ground grid networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this