Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Scoping Review of Flow Research

  • Corinna Peifer (Corresponding author)
  • , Gina Wolters
  • , László Harmat
  • , Jean Heutte
  • , Jasmine Tan
  • , Teresa Freire
  • , Dionísia Tavares
  • , Carla Fonte
  • , Frans Orsted Andersen
  • , Jef van den Hout
  • , Milija Šimleša
  • , Linda Pola
  • , Lucia Ceja
  • , Stefano Triberti

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

391 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Flow is a gratifying state of deep involvement and absorption that individuals report when facing a challenging activity and they perceive adequate abilities to cope with it (EFRN, 2014). The flow concept was introduced by Csikszentmihalyi in 1975, and interest in flow research is growing. However, to our best knowledge, no scoping review exists that takes a systematic look at studies on flow which were published between the years 2000 and 2016. Overall, 252 studies have been included in this review. Our review (1) provides a framework to cluster flow research, (2) gives a systematic overview about existing studies and their findings, and (3) provides an overview about implications for future research. The provided framework consists of three levels of flow research. In the first “Individual” level are the categories for personality, motivation, physiology, emotion, cognition, and behavior. The second “Contextual” level contains the categories for contextual and interindividual factors and the third “Cultural” level contains cultural factors that relate to flow. Using our framework, we systematically present the findings for each category. While flow research has made progress in understanding flow, in the future, more experimental and longitudinal studies are needed to gain deeper insights into the causal structure of flow and its antecedents and consequences.

Original languageEnglish
Article number815665
Number of pages27
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Apr 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
TF was funded by Psychology Research Centre (PSI/01662), School of Psychology, University of Minho, supported by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through the Portuguese State Budget (UIDB/PSI/01662/2020). JH was funded by I-SITE Université Lille Nord-Europe (ULNE), supported by the French state through the General Secretariat for Investment (SGPI) and the National Research Agency (I-SITE ULNE / ANR-16-IDEX-0004 ULNE).

Funding

TF was funded by Psychology Research Centre (PSI/01662), School of Psychology, University of Minho, supported by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through the Portuguese State Budget (UIDB/PSI/01662/2020). JH was funded by I-SITE Université Lille Nord-Europe (ULNE), supported by the French state through the General Secretariat for Investment (SGPI) and the National Research Agency (I-SITE ULNE / ANR-16-IDEX-0004 ULNE). TF was funded by Psychology Research Centre (PSI/01662), School of Psychology, University of Minho, supported by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through the Portuguese State Budget (UIDB/PSI/01662/2020). JH was funded by I-SITE Universit? Lille Nord-Europe (ULNE), supported by the French state through the General Secretariat for Investment (SGPI) and the National Research Agency (I-SITE ULNE / ANR-16-IDEX-0004 ULNE).

Keywords

  • contextual level
  • cultural level
  • flow
  • individual level
  • scoping review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Scoping Review of Flow Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this