A note on comparing response times in the M/GI/1/FB and M/GI/1/PS queues

A.C. Wierman; N. Bansal; M. Harchol-Balter

doi:10.1016/S0167-6377(03)00061-0

A note on comparing response times in the M/GI/1/FB and M/GI/1/PS queues

A.C. Wierman, N. Bansal, M. Harchol-Balter

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compare the overall mean response time (a.k.a. sojourn time) of the processor sharing (PS) and feedback (FB) queues under an M/GI/1 system. We show that 1713 outperforms PS under service distributions having decreasing failure rates; whereas PS outperforms FB under service distributions having increasing failure rates.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	73-76
Number of pages	4
Journal	Operations Research Letters
Volume	32
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6377(03)00061-0
Publication status	Published - 2004
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1016/S0167-6377(03)00061-0

Cite this

@article{7da7935f26454c4c8218ae812e3de977,

title = "A note on comparing response times in the M/GI/1/FB and M/GI/1/PS queues",

abstract = "We compare the overall mean response time (a.k.a. sojourn time) of the processor sharing (PS) and feedback (FB) queues under an M/GI/1 system. We show that 1713 outperforms PS under service distributions having decreasing failure rates; whereas PS outperforms FB under service distributions having increasing failure rates.",

author = "A.C. Wierman and N. Bansal and M. Harchol-Balter",

year = "2004",

doi = "10.1016/S0167-6377(03)00061-0",

language = "English",

volume = "32",

pages = "73--76",

journal = "Operations Research Letters",

issn = "0167-6377",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A note on comparing response times in the M/GI/1/FB and M/GI/1/PS queues

AU - Wierman, A.C.

AU - Bansal, N.

AU - Harchol-Balter, M.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - We compare the overall mean response time (a.k.a. sojourn time) of the processor sharing (PS) and feedback (FB) queues under an M/GI/1 system. We show that 1713 outperforms PS under service distributions having decreasing failure rates; whereas PS outperforms FB under service distributions having increasing failure rates.

AB - We compare the overall mean response time (a.k.a. sojourn time) of the processor sharing (PS) and feedback (FB) queues under an M/GI/1 system. We show that 1713 outperforms PS under service distributions having decreasing failure rates; whereas PS outperforms FB under service distributions having increasing failure rates.

U2 - 10.1016/S0167-6377(03)00061-0

DO - 10.1016/S0167-6377(03)00061-0

M3 - Article

SN - 0167-6377

VL - 32

SP - 73

EP - 76

JO - Operations Research Letters

JF - Operations Research Letters

IS - 1

ER -

A note on comparing response times in the M/GI/1/FB and M/GI/1/PS queues

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this